"Through a series of case studies, Patricia Roberts-Miller argues for seeing demagoguery as a way that people participate in public discourse, not necessarily populist and not necessarily heavily emotional.
Ed. Ciaran P. Cronin. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993. —. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Trans. Thomas Burger. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991. —. The Theory of Communicative ...
... Kendall Gerdes, Megan Gianfagna, Rhiannon Goad, Hannah Harrison, Justin Hatch, Tekla Hawkins, Rodney Herring, Vicky Hill, Nathan Kreuter, Mark Longaker, Stephanie Odom, Rachel Schneider, Jeremy Smyczek, Connie Steel, Jazmine Wells.
Some demagogues are easy to spot: They rise to power through pandering, charisma, and prejudice. But, as professor Patricia Roberts-Miller explains, a demagogue is anyone who reduces all questions to us vs. them. Why is it dangerous?
To answer this, the text provides a taxonomy, discussion, and evaluation of political theories that underpin democratic discourse, highlighting the relationship between various models of the public sphere and rhetorical theory.
What was the relationship between rhetoric and slavery, and how did rhetoric fail as an alternative to violence, becoming instead its precursor? Fanatical Schemes is a study of proslavery rhetoric...
Wiethoff has argued that there almost certainly were abusive scoundrels among the overseers, but he has also ... overseers to overwork slaves, it was still widely used because itwas profitable (Crafting the Overseer's Image 3–4).
Some demagogues are easy to spot: They rise to power through pandering, charisma, and prejudice. But, as professor Patricia Roberts-Miller explains, a demagogue is anyone who reduces all questions to us vs. them. Why is it dangerous?
Patricia Roberts-Miller is a scholar of rhetoric—the art of understanding misunderstandings.