... 'Feminism and Communitarianism: Comparing Critiques of Liberalism', above n 33; Frazer and Lacey, above n 25; G Parry, 'Paths to Citizenship' in Vogel and Moran, above n 26, 180; Gutmann, above n 23, 308; Etzioni, above n 22, 40; ...
... K. Chesebro, 'Galileo's Retort: Peter Huber's Junk Scholarship' (1993) 42 American University Law Review 1637, and M. Rustad, T. Koenig et ai, 'The Supreme Court and Junk Social Science: Selective Distortion in Amicus Briefs' (1993) ...
67 Carson has argued that the codes have had the opposite effect, creating trial by expert, with the court as 'quality auditors': D. Carson, 'Expert Evidence in the Courts' (1992) 1 Expert Evidence 13; D. Carson, 'A Role in Preventing ...
... 1992) 75; Dewar, above n 125; Smart and Neale, above n 15, 4; Purdy, above n 106; J Eekelaar, Family Law and Social Policy 2nd edn (London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1984) 43; Glendon, above n 19, 108; Finch and Mason, above n 21.
Parkinson, P. and Cashmore, J., The Voice of a Child in Family Law Disputes (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008). Perez-Vera, E., “Explanatory Report”, in Hague Conference on Private International Law, Acts and Documents of the 14th.
This essay aims to energize the debate about expert witness testimony in England and Wales through a comparative analysis of the admissibility of scientific evidence in Canadian criminal cases . An indirect approach to our topic partly ...