See, e.g., Larson v. Tansy, 911 F.2d 392, 396 (10th Cir. 1990) (closing argument, jury instructions); United States v. Fontanez, 878 F.2d 33 (2d Cir. 1989) (jury instructions). 133. See Larson, 911 F.2d at 396. In Rice v.
Court specifically left open this issue in Carey v . Musladin,122 noting that the lack of “state action” may distinguish such a situation from one involving “governmentsponsored practices.”123 The Supreme Court and lower courts also ...
The court determined that, although the two statements agreed about the events leading up to the stabbing, they differed on the issue crucial to petitioner's self-defense claim: “[Petitioner's] version asserts that Lee may have had ...
This text also addresses many issues of constitutional procedure not yet addressed by the United States Supreme Court that have been given extensive treatment by lower state and federal courts.
In Criminal Litigation & Legal Issues in Criminal Procedure, author Brent Newton merges elements from these two types of courses into one and seeks to bridge the gap between them.
20 Exercises to Sharpen Your Criminal Case Skills Brent E. Newton ... all lower court authorities (e.g., decisions of actual federal circuit courts and state supreme courts) are merely persuasive authorities in this mock trial exercise.
In Criminal Litigation & Legal Issues in Criminal Procedure, author Brent Newton merges elements from these two types of courses into one and seeks to bridge the gap between them.
Theory and practice go hand-in-hand in the newest edition of Criminal Litigation and Legal Issues in Criminal Procedure.