The key statement is an obiter one of Lord Wilberforce in Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Stahl GmbH (1983) concerning such non-instantaneous telex (and presumably fax) messages: 'no universal rule can cover all such cases; they must be resolved ...
178, 195, 217 Williams v Carwardine (1833) 5 C & P566; 172 ER 1101 ... 20 Williams v Roffey Bros [1991] 1 QB 1... 49, 50, 55, 62, 64–6, 74, A2 Williams v Williams [1957] 1 WLR 148 ... 60 With v O'Flanagan [1936] Ch 575.
These two revision and study guides have been packaged together to offer you great value when you're looking to get the most out of your revision.
These two revision and study guides have been packaged together to offer you great value when you're looking to get the most out of your revision.
These two revision and study guides have been packaged together to offer you great value when you're looking to get the most out of your revision.
These features make it unique" - Godwin Tan, law student, University College London "The concentrate revision guides stand out against other revision guides" - Renae Haynes Williams, law student, Bangor University "The exam style questions ...
This revision guide covers the key topics found on undergraduate courses. A number of pedagogical features help with the preparation for exams and suggest ways to improve marks.
CONTRACT LAW REVISION CONCENTRATE PACK: Law and Revision Guide
These two revision and study guides have been packaged together to offer you great value when you're looking to get the most out of your revision.
This revision guide covers the key topics found on undergraduate courses. A number of pedagogical features help with the preparation for exams and suggest ways to improve marks.
'Contract Law Concentrate' is written and designed to help you succeed. Accurate and reliable, 'Concentrate' guides go above and beyond, not only consolidating your learning but focusing your revision and maximising your potential.