Henry II (1154-89) through a series of astonishing dynastic coups became the ruler of an enormous European empire. One of the most dynamic, restless and clever men ever to rule England, he was brought down both by his catastrophic relationship with his archbishop Thomas Becket and his debilitating arguments with his sons, most importantly the future Richard I and King John. His empire may have ultimately collapsed, but in Richard Barber's vivid and sympathetic account the reader can see why Henry II left such a compelling impression on his contemporaries.
This shows a large bird, the name 'Philippa of Paulton' and a rhyming Latin couplet, referring to'a mad crane'.24 What was intended was probably a caricature of a woman, named Philippa of Paulton, depicted here in the guise of a bird ...
Charismatic, insatiable and cruel, Henry VIII was, as John Guy shows, a king who became mesmerized by his own legend - and in the process destroyed and remade England.
Quoted in Alan Marshall, Intelligence and Espionage in the Reign of Charles II, 1660–1685 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), p. 81. Slaughter (ed.), Ideology and Politics, p. 17. Robert South, Ecclesiastical Policy the best ...
See Herbert S. Klein, The Atlantic Slave Trade (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010); Jeremy Black, The Atlantic ... For John Newton see Jonathan Aitken, John Newton: From Disgrace to Amazing Grace (London: Continuum, 2007), ...
88–93; M. Brown, Bannockburn: The Scottish War and the British Isles, 1307–1323 (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2008), pp. 115–36. 4. Scalacronica, p. 75. 5. Scalacronica, pp. 74–7. 6. Johannis de Trokelowe et Henrici Blaneforde ...
In this lively study, Catherine Nall reappraises a monarch who weathered upheaval and uncertainty and held on to the throne through sheer force of will.
But, as John Gillingham makes clear in this elegant book, as the son and successor to William the Conqueror it was William Rufus who had to establish permanent Norman rule.
The resulting violence that spread throughout England was not, or not only, the work of bloodthirsty men on the make.
These extraordinary possibilities are fully dramatized in John Edward's superb short biography.
Seeking to reconcile this conflicting evidence, Thomas Asbridge's incisive reappraisal of Richard I's career questions whether the Lionheart really did neglect his kingdom, considers why he devoted himself to the cause of holy war and asks ...