Evaluations of a defendant's competence to stand trial (CST) are probably the most frequently performed forensic evaluations, with estimates in the United States ranging from 60,000 to 70,000 annually. In order for CST evaluations to be considered thorough and accurate, examiners must assess for possible lack of cooperation, feigning, or malingering - the intentional production or gross exaggeration of false or grossly exaggerated physical or psychiatric symptoms, motivated by external incentives. Yet, there are accounts that CST examiners often do not assess for negative response bias, and even if they do nevertheless fail to identify a considerable number of examinees that do feign. Assessing Negative Response Bias in Competency to Stand Trial Evaluations provides readers with a comprehensive guide to assessing whether a defendant has feigned mental impairment during a competency to stand trial evaluation, or simply did not put forth his/her best effort. This book reviews the literature on assessing feigning and negative response bias, with particular focus on issues, tests, and data relevant to CST evaluations, and examines proposed criteria and statistical methods of determining and classifying assessment results. It introduces readers to aspects of the vibrant neuropsychological response style literature, an area many forensic psychologists appear to have overlooked. Additionally, it offers recommendations for research and policy regarding the parameters of CST assessment.
Kuester, A., Köhler, K., Ehring, T., Knaevelsrud, C., Kober, L., Krüger-Gottschalk, A., Schafer, I. Schelling, J., Wesemann, U., & Rau, H. (2017). Comparison of DSM-5 and proposed ICD-11 criteria for PTSD with DSM-IV and ICD-10: Changes ...
The text begins by providing a background about decision-making capacity as a construct.
Assessing negative response bias in competency to stand trial evaluations. New York: Oxford University Press. Rubinsky, E. W., & Brandt, J. (1986). Amnesia and criminal law: A clinical overview. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 4, ...
Base rates of negative response bias and malingered neurocognitive dysfunction ... Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST): Forensic applications as a screen for feigned incompetence to stand trial. Law and Human Behavior, ...
Alcohol and Culture: Comparative Perspectives from Europe and America, Vol. 472. ... (2000) Cognitive function in UK community-dwelling African Caribbean and white elders: a pilot study. ... Psychological Medicine, 16, 909–928.
The Presidency of John Quincy Adams. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas. ... John Quincy Adams: A Personal History of an IndependentMan. Newtown, CT: American Political ... Holzer, H., ed. (1993a). Dear Mr. Lincoln: Letters to the ...
This volume brings together leading neuropsychologists to present the legal and clinical foundations of criminal forensic practice.
The Second Edition of Forensic Mental Health Assessment is thoroughly updated in light of the developments and changes in the field, while still keeping the unique structure of presenting cases, detailed reports, and specific teaching ...
This report critically reviews selected psychological tests, including symptom validity tests, that could contribute to SSA disability determinations.
Competency to Stand Trial