By definition, international law, once agreed upon and consented to, applies to all parties equally. It is perhaps the one area of law where cross-country comparison seems inappropriate, because all parties are governed by the same rules. However, as this book explains, states sometimes adhere to similar, and at other times, adopt different interpretations of the same international norms and standards. International legal rules are not a monolithic whole, but are the basis for ongoing contestation in which states set forth competing interpretations. International norms are interpreted and redefined by national executives, legislatures, and judiciaries. These varying and evolving interpretations can, in turn, change and impact the international rules themselves. These similarities and differences make for an important, but thus far, largely unexamined object of comparison. This is the premise for this book, and for what the editors call "comparative international law." This book achieves three objectives. The first is to show that international law is not a monolith. The second is to map the cross-country similarities and differences in international legal norms in different fields of international law, as well as their application and interpretation with regards to geographic differences. The third is to make a first and preliminary attempt to explain these differences. It is organized into three broad thematic sections, exploring: conceptual matters, domestic institutions and comparative international law, and comparing approaches across issue-areas. The chapters are authored by contributors who include leading international law and comparative law scholars with diverse backgrounds, experience, and perspectives.
This book takes the reader on a sweeping tour of the international legal field to reveal some of the patterns of difference, dominance, and disruption that belie international law's claim to universality.
This book develops a common level of international work on structures and concepts of modern tort law.
International Law in Comparative Perspective
... "Aufrechnung trotz (Fehlens einer) Schiedsvereinbarung nach osterreichischem Recht", in Mayer, von Schlabrendorff, Spiegelfeld and Welser (ed), Recht in Osterreich und Europa - Festschrift, FS Karl Hempel (Manz 1997), 119.
Cf US Senate Committee on the Judiciary, 'Confirmation Hearing on the Nomination of John G. Roberts, Jr. to be Chief Justice of the United States, September 12–15, 2005', Serial No. J-109–37, 201 ('Foreign Law. You can find anything you ...
This Oxford Handbook ambitiously seeks to lay the groundwork for the relatively new field of comparative foreign relations law.
Throughout the book, there is extensive information about the law and practice of other mostly civil-law countries that provides an opportunity for instructive comparative discussion. One chapter is devoted to...
During the Tharu cultural festival, Maghi,14 often both categories of Kamayia go to their masters to ask for loans in ... the sons and daughters could be sold during the Maghi festival or presented as gifts from a bride's family to the ...
justum " is entirely different from the same phrase deriving from the scholastic notion of “ just war , " involving “ just cause , ” “ just object , " and " just intention . ” ( St. Thomas adds “ lawful authority , ” and does not ...
Provides a detailed analysis of how Russia's understanding of international law has developed Draws on historical, theoretical, and practical perspectives to offer the reader the 'big picture' of Russia's engagement with international law ...