"What kind of nuclear strategy and posture does the United States need to defend itself and its allies? Contrary to conventional wisdom, this book explains why a robust nuclear posture, above and beyond a mere second-strike capability, contributes to a state's national security goals" (ed.).
The Illogic of American Nuclear Strategy
'...Lawrence Freedman has provided a masterly account of the evolution of nuclear strategic thought which is steeped in scholarship, elegantly written, and comprehensive in scope.' Edward M.Spiers, Times Higher Education Supplement
Janne E. Nolan and James R. Holmes, ''The Bureaucracy of Deterrence,'' Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 64, no. 1 (March–April 2008): 42–43. 14. Janne Nolan, An Elusive Consensus (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1999), 45. 15.
... which can be minimised through governance structures that facilitate the transfer of information, help formulate agreements, and enforce compliance.25 Richard Higgott points out that 'the power to mold understandings ...
“This is just like Communism”: Transcript, “Adm. Burke's Conversation with Secretary Franke, 12 August 1960,” Arleigh Burke Papers, SIOP/ NSTL Briefing Folder, Navy Yard, Washington, DC*; Kaplan, op. cit. 265-67. “You're more generous”: ...
This book is a counter to the conventional wisdom that the United States can and should do more to reduce both the role of nuclear weapons in its security strategies and the number of weapons in its arsenal.
Fuhrmann, Matthew, “Exporting Mass Destruction? The Determinants of Dual-Use Trade,” Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 45, No.5 (September 2008). ——, “The Nuclear Marketplace and Grand Strategy,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Georgia, ...
Frank in its tone and farsighted in its analysis, The Second Nuclear Age is the essential guide to the new rules of international politics.
The author explores how the US government has underestimated the damage caused by nuclear weapons, leading it to build far more - and far more destructive - warheads than are needed for war-planning purposes.
The author reviews the history of nuclear deterrence and calls for a renewed intellectual effort to address the relevance of concepts such as first strike, escalation, extended deterrence, and other Cold War-era strategies in today's ...