The eminent legal historian William E. Nelson's magisterial four-volume The Common Law in Colonial America traces how the many legal orders of Britain's thirteen North American colonies gradually evolved into one American system. Initially established on divergent political, economic, and religious grounds, the various colonial systems slowly converged until it became possible by the 1770s to imagine that all thirteen participated in a common American legal order, which diverged in its details but differed far more substantially from English common law. This fourth and final volume begins where volume three ended. It focuses on the laws of the thirteen colonies in the mid-eighteenth century and on constitutional events leading up to the American Revolution. Nelson first examines procedural and substantive law and looks at important shifts in the law to show how the mid-eighteenth- century colonial legal system in large part functioned effectively in the interests both of Great Britain and of its thirteen colonies. Nelson then turns to constitutional events leading to the Revolution. Here he shows how lawyers deployed ideological arguments not for their own sake, but in order to protect colonial institutional structures and the socio-economic interests of their clients. As lawyers deployed the arguments, they developed them into a constitutional theory that gave primacy to common-law constitutional rights and local self-government. In the process, the lawyers became leaders of the revolutionary movement and a dominant political force in the new United States.
As this volume reveals, these trends in governance ultimately resulted in a tension between top-down pressures from Britain for a more uniform system of laws and bottom-up pressures from colonists to develop their own common law norms and ...
As this volume reveals, these trends in governance ultimately resulted in a tension between top-down pressures from Britain for a more uniform system of laws and bottom-up pressures from colonists to develop their own common law norms and ...
In this first volume, Nelson explores how the law of the Chesapeake colonies--Virginia and Maryland--differed from the New England colonies--Massachusetts Bay, Connecticut, New Haven, Plymouth, and Rhode Island--and looks at the differences ...
... in American History: Public Values and Private Conscience (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016); William G. McLoughlin, New England Dissent, 1630–1833: The Baptists and the Separation of Church and State, 1 (Cambridge, Mass.
Francis Moryson and Henry Randolph, eds., The Laws of Virginia Now in Force (London, 1662), 2. 6. Inhabitants v. Cololough, Northumberland County Va. ... Howard Mackey (Rockport, Me.: Picton Press, 2000), 347.
An unabridged republication of the first edition published in Madison, Wisconsin, in 1899, as number 31 in the Economics, political science, and history series of the Bulletin of the University...
After concluding that the mid-eighteenth-century colonial legal system usually functioned effectively, this text focuses on constitutional events leading to the American Revolution, showing how lawyers used ideology in the interests of ...
The extensive introduction addresses the intellectual challenges posed by comparative approaches to legal history. This is followed by twelve essays derived from papers delivered at the 24th British Legal History Conference.
Morton, NfCP, 1-03, although a contract for goods furnished in learning a new profession was voidable. ... case on expectation damages for breach of a contract that may not, however, have been purely executory, see Wheeler v.
In E Pluribus Unum, eminent legal historian William E. Nelson shows that the colonies' gradual embrace of the common law was instrumental to the establishment of the United States.