Liberal democracy is the dominant political ideology in the West today. Taken at face value it suggests an equivalency between its two central components--liberalism and democracy--but as Fred Dallmayr argues here, the two operate in very different registers. The two frequently conflict, endangering our public life.This is evident in the rise of self-centered neo-liberalism as well as autocratic movements in our world today. More specifically, the conflict within liberal democracy is between the pursuit of individual or coporate interest, on the one hand, and a "people" increasingly fractured by economic and cultural clashes, on the other. Dallmayr asks whether there is still room for genuine privacy and authentic democracy when all public goods, from schools to parks, police, and armies, have been made the target of privatization. In this book, Dallmayr sets out to rescue democracy as a shared public and post-liberal regime. Nonetheless, "post-liberalism" does not involve the denial of human freedom nor does it suggest the endorsement of illiberal collectivism or nationalism. Drawing on a wide range of contemporary political, religious, and secular thought, Dallmayr charts a possible path to a liberal socialism that is devoid of egalitarian imperatives and a private sphere free from acquisitiveness.
John Gray has become one of our liveliest and most influential political philosophers. This current volume is a sequel to his Liberalisms: Essays in Political Philosophy.
Ceasar is walking with Will and Caroline with a tether around his neck to keep him from running off. When the three encounter a pet German Shepherd on a leash, Ceasar signs to Will the question, “Am I a pet?” Will signs back, “No.
This bold book shows that only a politics which fuses economic justice with social solidarity and ecological balance can overcome our deep divisions and save us from authoritarian backlash.
Thomas Malthus, An Essay on the Principle of Population as It Affects the Future Improvement of Society (London: Johnson, 1798), 349. 68. Ibid., 363. 69. Ibid., 375. 70. Thomas Carlyle had mainly the Malthusian perspective in mind when ...
From campus wars over academic freedom to the Charlie Hebdo attack and the murder of Samuel Paty, this is an indispensable guide for anyone wanting to understand the why, what and how of the post-liberal world.
This book analyzes how, and to what extent, the rise of populism and “identitarian” political movements, as well as the acceptance of world leaders who embody an authoritarian style of government, has undermined this compromise.
In After Liberalism, the distinguished historian and political scientist Immanuel Wallerstein examines the process of disintegration of our modern world-system and speculates on the changes that may occur during the next few decades.
Whether one is interested in the future of the welfare state or family values, or the economic and social future of America, this is a book one wishes to read.
R. B. Braithwaite, for example, interpreted religious statements as expressions of “behavior policies”; Don Cupitt argued that religious statements were expressions of “internalized spiritual principles”; and for Paul van Buren, ...
Paul Gottfried does more than analyze these historical facts, however.