This is a study of the principal negotiating processes and law-making tools through which contemporary international law is made. It does not seek to give an account of the traditional - and untraditional - sources and theories of international law, but rather to identify the processes, participants and instruments employed in the making of international law. It accordingly examines some of the mechanisms and procedures whereby new rules of law are created or old rules are amended or abrogated. It concentrates on the UN, other international organisations, diplomatic conferences, codification bodies, NGOs, and courts. Every society perceives the need to differentiate between its legal norms and other norms controlling social, economic and political behaviour. But unlike domestic legal systems where this distinction is typically determined by constitutional provisions, the decentralised nature of the international legal system makes this a complex and contested issue. Moreover, contemporary international law is often the product of a subtle and evolving interplay of law-making instruments, both binding and non-binding, and of customary law and general principles. Only in this broader context can the significance of so-called 'soft law' and multilateral treaties be fully appreciated. An important question posed by any examination of international law-making structures is the extent to which we can or should make judgments about their legitimacy and coherence, and if so in what terms. Put simply, a law-making process perceived to be illegitimate or incoherent is more likely to be an ineffective process. From this perspective, the assumption of law-making power by the UN Security Council offers unique advantages of speed and universality, but it also poses a particular challenge to the development of a more open and participatory process observable in other international law-making bodies.
Examines the relationship between imperialism and international law.
This book explores law-making in international affairs and is compiled to celebrate the 50th birthday of Professor Jan Klabbers, a leading international law and international relations scholar who has made significant contributions to the ...
By focusing on actual state practice, official statements of governments and the pronouncements of the World Court, this book seeks to clarify the content and significance of the existing community consensus concerning the authoritative ...
The Making of International Law in Korea addresses the development of international law in Korea and Korea’s approach to contemporary international legal issues.
75 See in particular: Hauschildt v Denmark (App 10486/83), 24 May 1989, (1990) 12 EHHR 266; De Cubber v Belgium (supra n 53); Piersack v Belgium (supra n 53); Barbera et al. v Venezuela (2008) Series C, No 182, Judgment of 5 August 2008 ...
This book provides a critique of current international law-making and draws on a set of principles from Persian philosophers to present an alternative to influence the development of international law-making procedure.
This book analyses this informal international lawmaking and its impact on contemporary trends in international interaction, looking at the questions of accountability and effectiveness it raises.
Alfred von Tirpitz, Politische Dokumente: Deutsche Ohnmachtspolitik im Weltkriege (Hamburg, 1926), 58. 78. Niall Ferguson, The Pity of War: Explaining World War I (New York, 1998), 248–49. 79. Reinhold Zilch, Okkupation und Währung im ...
"Comparative law is increasingly used as a tool in the making of law at national, regional and international levels.
Teaches how and why states make, break, and uphold international law using accessible explanations and contemporary international issues.