We are said to face a crisis of over-criminalization: our criminal law has become chaotic, unprincipled, and over-expansive. This book proposes a normative theory of criminal law, and of criminalization, that shows how criminal law could be ordered, principled, and restrained. The theory is based on an account of criminal law as a distinctive legal practice that functions to declare and define a set of public wrongs, and to call to formal public account those who commit such wrongs; an account of the role that such practice can play in a democratic republic of free and equal citizens; and an account of the central features of such a political community, and of the way in which it constitutes its public realm-its civil order. Criminal law plays an important, but limited, role in such a political community in protecting, but also partly constituting, its civil order. On the basis of this account, we can see how such a political community will decide what kinds of conduct should be criminalized - not by applying one or more of the substantive master principles that theorists have offered, but by considering which kinds of conduct fall within its public realm (as distinct from the private realms that are not the polity's business), and which kinds of wrong within that realm require this distinctive kind of response (rather than one of the other kinds of available response). The outcome of such a deliberative process will probably be a more limited, and a more rational and principled, criminal law.
This book proposes a theory of criminal law, as an institution that can play an important but limited role in the civil order of a political community: it shows how criminal law could be ordered, principled, and restrained.
A vital examination of one of the most important topics in modern criminal legal theory, this volume raises new questions central to the study of the criminal law and offers new suggestions for addressing them.
This is the first book of a series on criminalization - examining the principles and goals that should guide what kinds of conduct are to be criminalized, and the forms that criminalization should take.
10 Men, Women and Civil Society: Male Civility in the Twenty-first Century In 2016, English artist and public intellectual, Grayson Perry, named the man problem of crime and issued a challenge to women: Men commit ninety per cent of ...
The Criminalization series arose from an interdisciplinary investigation into criminalization, focussing on the principles that might guide decisions about what kinds of conduct should be criminalized, and the forms that criminalization ...
In this long-awaited book, Antony Duff offers a new perspective on the structures of criminal law and criminal liability.
Smith shows that the number of summary offences on the statute book rose from 70 in the 1660s to over 200 by the 1770s: he argues that these summary offences were easy ways of proving what would otherwise have been charged as a felony, ...
Case excerpts and detailed case summaries, used to highlight important principles of criminal law, are featured throughout the text.
Punishment Without Crime offers an urgent new interpretation of inequality and injustice in America by examining the paradigmatic American offense: the lowly misdemeanor.
Criminal justice and democracy -- Criminal justice by the invisible hand -- The free market law of plea bargaining -- Private responsibility for criminal justice -- The high cost of efficiency -- Criminal justice and the security state -- ...