'Equity and Trusts Law Directions' is an authoritative yet lively text with an emphasis on explaining clearly the key topics covered on equity and trusts courses. Rich learning features demonstrate how the law of equity and trusts is applied in the real world, and why it is such a stimulating and exciting field.
A considered balance of depth, detail, context, and critique, Directions books offer the most student-friendly guide to the subject; they empower students to evaluate the law, understand its practical application, and approach assessments ...
Online Resource Centre The second edition of Equity and Trusts Directions is supported by a fully comprehensive Online Resource Centre featuring Weblinks Pointers for answering the self-assessment questions Podcast Flashcard glossary ...
Drawing on years of experience, Gary Watt encourages students to actively engage with the subject and think critically about its centralissues, outlining the key perspectives with clarity and rigour.Online Resources accompany this book, ...
Linked together by Gary Watt's engaging commentary, this is an essential resource for a subject that is heavily case law based.
Equity and Trusts Law Directions is an authoritative yet lively text with an emphasis on explaining clearly the key topics covered on equity and trusts courses.
Equity and Trusts Law
This textbook has been designed to provide students with a clear, step-by-step guide to all the main topics covered on undergraduate courses in trusts and equity, with a particular emphasis on trusts in modern contexts.
Pearson (S) & Son Ltd v Dublin Corp [1907] AC 351. . . 140, 195 Perry v Sydney Phillips [1982] 1 WLR 1297. . .305 Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd [1953] 1 QB 401 . . .26 Philips hong Kong v ...
Covers all the core areas of human rights law, combining an engaging approach with helpful learning features and plenty of headings to make this an ideal text for those new to the subject Summaries, definitions, discussion topics and ...
Compare Fox J's and Lord Russell's analysis of the consequences of the power of accumulation with that of Viscount Dilhorne: Pearson v IRC [1979] 1 All ER 273 at 281 Fox]: The position as to the trustees' power of accumulation, ...