Women Letter-Writers in Tudor England represents one of the most comprehensive study of women's letters and letter-writing during the early modern period to be undertaken, and acts as an important corrective to traditional ways of reading and discussing letters as private, elite, male, and non-political. Based on over 3,000 manuscript letters, it shows that letter-writing was a larger and more socially diversified area of female activity than has been hitherto assumed. In that letters constitute the largest body of extant sixteenth-century women's writing, the book initiates a reassessment of women's education and literacy in the period. As indicators of literacy, letters yield physical evidence of rudimentary writing activity and abilities, document 'higher' forms of female literacy, and highlight women's mastery of formal rhetorical and epistolary conventions. Women Letter-Writers in Tudor England also stresses that letters are unparalleled as intimate and immediate records of family relationships, and as media for personal and self-reflective forms of female expression. Read as documents that inscribe social and gender relations, letters shed light on the complex range of women's personal relationships, as female power and authority fluctuated, negotiated on an individual basis. Furthermore, correspondence highlights the important political roles played by early modern women. Female letter-writers were integral in cultivating and maintaining patronage and kinship networks; they were active as suitors for crown favour, and operated as political intermediaries and patrons in their own right, using letters to elicit influence. Letters thus help to locate differing forms of female power within the family, locality and occasionally on the wider political stage, and offer invaluable primary evidence from which to reconstruct the lives of early modern women.
Daybell examines a crucial period in the development of the English vernacular letter before Charles I's postal reforms in 1635, one that witnessed a significant extension of letter-writing skills throughout society.
This landmark book of essays examines the development of women's letter writing from the late fifteenth to the early eighteen century.
Religion. and. Letter. Writing. Modern scholarship that deals in some way with early modern British letters and religion over roughly the last 40 years may be generally divided into five groups: (1) studies of women's letters and ...
Gender, writing and the life of the mind in early modern England Leonie Hannan. Daybell, J. Women Letter-Writers in Tudor England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006). Daybell, J. (ed.), Early Modern Women's Letter-Writing, ...
He is currently completing a monograph entitled Women Letter-Writers in Tudor England (forthcoming, Oxford University Press, 2005). Erin Henriksen is Visiting Lecturer in the English Department at Tel Aviv University (Israel).
21 Jonathan Gibson, “Significant Space in Manuscript Letters,” The Seventeenth Century 12.1 (Spring 1997): 6–7. 22 Howard Jones, Master Tully: Cicero in Tudor England (Nieuwkoop: De Graaf, 1998) 260–70. 23 Henderson, “Erasmus” 332, 334, ...
On early modern epistolary networks and their importance, see O'Neill, The Opened Letter. See Daybell, Women Letter-Writers in Tudor England, 265. On letters as sources, the materiality of letters, and the epistolary culture and ...
Daybell, James, 'Interpreting Letters and Reading Script: Evidence for Female Education and Literacy in Tudor England', History of Education, 34/6 (2005), 695–716. Daybell, James, The Material Letter in Early Modern England: Manuscript ...
James Daybell, Women Letter Writers in Tudor England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), 11. 4. See Jacqueline Eales, 'Patriarchy, Puritanism and Politics: The Letters of Lady Brilliana Harley (1598–1643)', in Early Modern Women's ...
In Tudor and Stuart Britain, women writers took active roles in negotiating cultural ideas and systems to gain power by participating in politics through writing, shaping the aesthetics of genre, and fashioning feminine gender, despite ...