Around the common law world, the law of judicial review of administrative action has changed dramatically in recent decades, accelerating a centuries-long process of incremental evolution. This book offers a fresh framework for understanding the core features of contemporary administrative law. Through comparative analysis of case law from Australia, Canada, England, Ireland, and New Zealand, the author develops an interpretive approach by reference to four values: individual self-realisation, good administration, electoral legitimacy, and decisional autonomy. The interaction of this plurality of values explains the structure of the vast field of judicial review of administrative action: institutional structures, procedural fairness, substantive review, remedies, restrictions on remedies, and the scope of judicial review. Addressing this wide array of subjects in detail, the book demonstrates how a pluralist approach, with the values being employed in a complementary and balanced fashion, can enhance our understanding of administrative law. Furthermore, such an approach can guide the future development of the law of judicial review of administrative action, a point illustrated by a careful analysis of the unsettled doctrinal area of legitimate expectation. The book closes by arguing that the author's values-based, pluralist framework supports the legitimacy of contemporary administrative law which, although sometimes called into question, facilitates the flourishing of individuals, of public administration, and of the liberal democratic system.
As Vanderbilt points out in his introduction, this is an important field that involves much more than administrative procedure.
Research on comparative administrative law, in contrast to comparative constitutional law, remains largely underdeveloped. This book plugs that gap.
This text includes a significant amount of discussion on trends in administrative law such as deregulation & regulatory reform, & alternative dispute resolution. While the focus is on federal administrative...
This implication was made explicit by Kirby J in another case , stating that a special vigilance is required ' in reviewing the decisions of ' non - court repositories of functions , powers and discretions ' . The point was taken a step ...
In A Culture of Justification, Paul Daly explains why Canada’s administrative law was uncertain and confusing, and he assesses the proposition that Vavilov provides a roadmap to a brighter future.
At the time of these lectures Schwartz was Director of the Institute. Includes a bibliography by Julius J. Marke. Reprint of the first edition.
Process and Substance John Bell, Mark Elliott, Jason NE Varuhas, Philip Murray ... MC Elliott, Beatson, Matthews and Elliott's Administrative Law, 4th edn (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011), ch 13; PP Craig, Administrative Law, ...
... 2007); D.R. Songer, S.W. Johnson, C.L. Ostberg, and M.E. Wetstein, Law, Ideology, and Collegiality: Judicial Behaviour in the Supreme Court of Canada (Montreal and Kingston, McGill-Queen's University Press, 2012); E. Macfarlane, ...
It is with the greatest pleasure that I add a few introductory remarks to the book of Dr. Mahendra Pal Singh on German administrative law.
This book explores critical issues about how courts engage with questions of fact in public law adjudication.