This book offers a new framework for understanding contemporary administrative law, through a comparative analysis of case law from Australia, Canada, England, Ireland, and New Zealand. The author argues that the field is structured by four values: individual self-realisation, good administration, electoral legitimacy and decisional autonomy.
As Vanderbilt points out in his introduction, this is an important field that involves much more than administrative procedure.
Research on comparative administrative law, in contrast to comparative constitutional law, remains largely underdeveloped. This book plugs that gap.
This text includes a significant amount of discussion on trends in administrative law such as deregulation & regulatory reform, & alternative dispute resolution. While the focus is on federal administrative...
This implication was made explicit by Kirby J in another case , stating that a special vigilance is required ' in reviewing the decisions of ' non - court repositories of functions , powers and discretions ' . The point was taken a step ...
In A Culture of Justification, Paul Daly explains why Canada’s administrative law was uncertain and confusing, and he assesses the proposition that Vavilov provides a roadmap to a brighter future.
At the time of these lectures Schwartz was Director of the Institute. Includes a bibliography by Julius J. Marke. Reprint of the first edition.
Process and Substance John Bell, Mark Elliott, Jason NE Varuhas, Philip Murray ... MC Elliott, Beatson, Matthews and Elliott's Administrative Law, 4th edn (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011), ch 13; PP Craig, Administrative Law, ...
... 2007); D.R. Songer, S.W. Johnson, C.L. Ostberg, and M.E. Wetstein, Law, Ideology, and Collegiality: Judicial Behaviour in the Supreme Court of Canada (Montreal and Kingston, McGill-Queen's University Press, 2012); E. Macfarlane, ...
It is with the greatest pleasure that I add a few introductory remarks to the book of Dr. Mahendra Pal Singh on German administrative law.
This book explores critical issues about how courts engage with questions of fact in public law adjudication.