The United States Supreme Court famously labeled copyright "the engine of free expression" because it provides a vital economic incentive for much of the literature, commentary, music, art, and film that makes up our public discourse. Yet today's greatly expanded copyright law often does the opposite - it can be used to quash news reporting, political commentary, church dissent, historical scholarship, cultural critique, and artistic expression. In Copyright's Paradox, Neil Weinstock Netanel explores the tensions between copyright law and free speech concerns, revealing how copyright law can impose unacceptable burdens on speech. Netanel provides concrete illustrations of how copyright often prevents speakers from effectively conveying their message, tracing this conflict across both traditional and digital media and considering current controversies such as the YouTube and MySpace copyright infringements, Hip-hop music and digital sampling, and the Google Book Search litigation. The author juxtaposes the dramatic expansion of copyright holders' proprietary control against the individual's newly found ability to digitally cut, paste, edit, remix, and distribute sound recordings, movies, TV programs, graphics, and texts the world over. He tests whether, in light of these developments and others, copyright still serves as a vital engine of free expression and he assesses how copyright does - and does not - burden speech. Taking First Amendment values as his lodestar, Netanel argues that copyright should be limited to how it can best promote robust debate and expressive diversity, and he presents a blueprint for how that can be accomplished. Copyright and free speech will always stand in some tension. But there are ways in which copyright can continue to serve as an engine of free expression while leaving ample room for speakers to build on copyrighted works to convey their message, express their personal commitments, and fashion new art. This book shows us how.
Trademark law does not prevent anyone from using a word that serves as a company's trademark in a context that does not cause consumer confusion or dilution. I can sing a song containing the line, “An apple doesn't fall far from the ...
L. Bently and M. Kretschmer. http://copy.law.cam.ac.uk/cam/index.php. ______ . 2008g. ... 2008h. Commentary on German Printers' and Booksellers' Ordinances and Statutes. ... Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. Keyl, Stephen Mark.
Cf. Neil Netanel Copyright's Paradox (Oxford University Press, Inc., New York: 2008) [Netanel, Paradox], making this argument in the US context. 12. This is the description of copyright employed by David Fewer in his discussion of 'the ...
Superstars Matthew Haag was an introverted teenager without much of a social life. Short and frail, he was no athlete. Instead he spent most of his time playing video games in his bedroom in Palos Hills, Illinois, his pale complexion ...
More recently, however, Bartels and Johnston (2020) argue that these items encapsulate a variety of concepts that include procedural perceptions, trust, and institutional restructuring. Their preferred measurement strategy focuses on ...
Defense expert Michael O'Hanlon wrestles with these questions in this insightful book, setting them within the broader context of hegemonic change and today's version of great-power competition.
In 'From Maimonides to Microsoft', Professors Netanel and Nimmer trace the development of Jewish copyright law by relaying the stories of five dramatic disputes, running from the sixteenth century to the present.
In The Story Paradox, Gottschall explores how a broad consortium of psychologists, communications specialists, neuroscientists, and literary quants are using the scientific method to study how stories affect our brains.
Paradox is a chilling mix of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, old secrets that refuse to stay buried, and ruthless greed that keep Savich and Sherlock and Chief Christie working at high speed to uncover the truth before their own bones end up at ...
In The Platform Paradox: How Digital Businesses Succeed in an Ever-Changing Global Marketplace, Wharton professor Mauro F. Guillén highlights a key incongruity in this new world.