Braithwaite's argument against punitive justice systems and for restorative justice systems establishes that there are good theoretical and empirical grounds for anticipating that well designed restorative justice processes will restore victims, offenders, and communities better than existing criminal justice practices. Counterintuitively, he also shows that a restorative justice system may deter, incapacitate, and rehabilitate more effectively than a punitive system. This is particularly true when the restorative justice system is embedded in a responsive regulatory framework that opts for deterrence only after restoration repeatedly fails, and incapacitation only after escalated deterrence fails. Braithwaite's empirical research demonstrates that active deterrence under the dynamic regulatory pyramid that is a hallmark of the restorative justice system he supports, is far more effective than the passive deterrence that is notable in the stricter "sentencing grid" of current criminal justice systems.
In this volume, John Braithwaite brings together his important work on restorative justice with his work on business regulation to form a sweepingly novel picture of the way society regulates itself.
This book is available for free in PDF format as Open Access from the individual product page at www.routledge.com. It has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution- Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 license.
This book transcends current debate on government regulation by lucidly outlining how regulations can be a fruitful combination of persuasion and sanctions.
This book brings together a selection of papers originally presented and discussed at the fourth international restorative justice conference, held at the University of Tübingen.
This 2002 book addresses one of the most controversial topics in restorative justice: its potential for dealing with conflicts within families.
The present handbook offers, in a quick reference format, an overview of key considerations in the implementation of participatory responses to crime based on a restorative justice approach.
Maxwell, G. and Shepherd, P. (1998), Evaluation of the Counselling for Families of Murder Victims Scheme, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet Crime Prevention Unit and Institute of Criminology, Wellington.
Ayres, I & Braithwaite, J (1992) Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate, New York: Oxford University Press. Ayers, W, Dohrn, B & Ayers, R (2001) Zero Tolerance: Resisting the Drive for Punishment in Our Schools, ...
In social work, as in other disciplines, researchers at all levels are drowning in potentially useful scholarly information, and this guide has been created as a tool for cutting through that material to find the exact source you need.
Community Panel Adult Pre - Trial Diversion : Supplementary Evaluation . Wellington : Institute of Criminology , Victoria University of Wellington . Merry , S. E. ( 1993 ) . " Sorting Out Popular Justice ' , in S. E. Merry and N. Milner ...