For decades, administrations of both political parties have used cost-benefit analysis to evaluate and improve federal policy in a variety of areas, including health and the environment. Today, this model is under grave threat. In Reviving Rationality, Michael Livermore and Richard Revesz explain how Donald Trump has destabilized the decades-long bipartisan consensus that federal agencies must base their decisions on evidence, expertise, and analysis. Administrative agencies are charged by law with protecting values like stable financial markets and clean air. Their decisions often have profound consequences, affecting everything from the safety of workplaces to access to the dream of home ownership. Under the Trump administration, agencies have been hampered in their ability to advance these missions by the conflicting ideological whims of a changing cast of political appointees and overwhelming pressure from well-connected interest groups. Inconvenient evidence has been ignored, experts have been sidelined, and analysis has been used to obscure facts, rather than inform the public. The results are grim: incoherent policy, social division, defeats in court, a demoralized federal workforce, and a loss of faith in government's ability to respond to pressing problems. This experiment in abandoning the norms of good governance has been a disaster. Reviving Rationality explains how and why our government has abandoned rationality in recent years, and why it is so important for future administrations to restore rigorous cost-benefit analysis if we are to return to a policymaking approach that effectively tackles the most pressing problems of our era.
The hard work of rebuilding a rational regulatory system will fall to future administrations.
54 Alan B. Morrison, OMB Interference With Agency Rulemaking: The Wrong Way to Write a Regulation, 99 Harv. L. Rev. 1059 (1986). 55 Id. at 1064. 56 Id. 57 Id. 58 Id. at 1066. 59 133 Cong. Rec. E3449-01 (Sep.
At the heart of this volume is a set of nine case studies illustrating the complexities of risk tradeoffs, ranging from personal medical choices to control of toxic substances to prevention of global crises.
Michael Gough , at Resources for the Future , suggests that fully effective EPA regulation would reduce cancer deaths by between 1200 and 6600 each year . Michael Gough , " How Much Cancer Can EPA Regulate Away ?
To this end, this book advocates a re-foundation of spatial planning under the paradigm of “ecological rationality”, based on the revaluation of early pioneers of ecological planning and mutual fertilization with different disciplines, ...
The book offers a revisionist position in the history of ideas, arguing that Renaissance Christian humanism in England descended not from Tudor to Stuart Anglicanism but from Tudor Anglicanism to revolutionary Puritanism.
In Hidden Games, Moshe Hoffman and Erez Yoeli find a surprising middle ground between the hyperrationality of classical economics and the hyper-irrationality of behavioral economics. They call it hidden games.
KEENEY, Ralph L., and RAIFFA, Howard, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (New York, Wiley & Sons, 1976). KELSEY, D. Topics in Social Choice (Oxford, D.Phil, thesis, 1982). KEMP, Murray C, and NG, ...
Both Hamka and Nasution share similar views about the necessity of reviving rationality through the Qur'an. Both men draw from the exegesis of the Mu'tazilite thinker Al- Zamakshari (1075–1144) to promote their views regarding the ...
BothHamkaandNasu- tion shared similar views about the necessity of reviving rationality through engagementwith theQurʾān.Tothatend, both men drewuponthe exegesis of the Muʿtazilitethinker, Abū al-Qāsim Maḥmūd al-Zamakhsharī ...