A unique reinterpretation of democracy that shows how history's most vocal champions of democracy from Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Thomas Jefferson to John Rawls have contributed to a pervasive, anti-democratic ideology, effectively redefining democracy to mean "rule by the elites." The rise of global populism reveals a tension in Western thinking about democracy. Warnings about the "populist threat" to democracy and "authoritarian" populism are now commonplace. However, as Emily B. Finley argues in The Ideology of Democratism, dismissing "populism" as anti-democratic is highly problematic. In effect, such arguments essentially reject the actual popular will in favor of a purely theoretical and abstract "will of the people." She contends that the West has conceptualized democracy-not just its populist doppelgänger-as an ideal that has all of the features of a thoroughgoing political ideology which she labels "democratism." As she shows, this understanding of democracy, which constitutes an entire view of life and politics, has been and remains a powerful influence in America and leading Western European nations and their colonial satellites. Through a careful analysis of several of history's most vocal champions of democracy, including Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Thomas Jefferson, Woodrow Wilson, John Rawls, and American neoconservatives and liberal internationalists, Finley identifies an interpretation of democracy that effectively transforms the meaning of "rule by the people" into nearly its opposite. Making use of democratic language and claiming to speak for the people, many politicians, philosophers, academics, and others advocate a more "complete" and "genuine" form of democracy that in practice has little regard for the actual popular will. A heterodox argument that challenges the prevailing consensus of what democracy is and what it is supposed be, The Ideology of Democratism offers a timely and comprehensive assessment of the features and thrust of this powerful new view of democracy that has enchanted the West.
Explaining International Politics with Democracy Beyond the State Agné, Hans. Gaventa, John. 1982. ... Must Global Politics Constrain Democracy Great-Power Realism, Democratic Peace, and Democratic Internationalism.
In this book, Somit and Peterson argue that the main reason for this pattern is that humans are social primates with an innate tendency for hierarchical and authoritarian social and political structures.
I have been in a twenty-five-year-long discussion about philosophy with Tamar Szabo Gendler and Zoltan Gendler Szabo. Gendler's work on alief is a deeply important contribution to the theory of ideology. I have learned much engaging ...
This collection of essays addresses a variety of fundamental questions about democracy.
Urged on by a powerful ideological and political movement, George W. Bush committed the United States to a quest for empire. American values and principles were universal, he asserted, and should guide the transformation of the world.
This is an examination of each of the major ideologies that have shaped political thinking, action and conflict.
More explicit is Alan Gilbert , who concludes his book , Must Global Politics Constrain Democracy ?, with a chapter invoking his earlier employment of deliberative - democratic theory ( 1999 : ch . 5 ) .
This text provides a survey of the major isms that have shaped and reshaped the political landscape of our century, and also shows how these ideologies originated and how they have changed over time.
Reality is characterized by impersonal modes of communication and the delineation of buying-power as the ultimate measure of self-efficacy. According to Campbell (1996), “at the core of our sense of self, then, is our feeling of loss ...
Repressive Tolerance HERBERT MARCUSE This essay examines the idea of tolerance in our advanced industrial society. The conclusion reached is that the realization of the objective of tolerance would call for intolerance toward prevailing ...