There is a growing recognition of the challenge that religions pose for pluralist, multicultural democracies. 'Fundamentalist' beliefs and practices test the limits of religious freedom, and seem to contradict the very basis on which liberal states protect religious liberty. Religions,moreover, are often associated with intolerance and persecution, yet insist upon religious liberty for themselves. This book inverts these stereotypes by presenting a sustained critique of how religious liberty ought to be understood in liberal legal systems and develops an alternative, Christianresponse.In Part One the prevailing liberal approach to religious freedom is compared with historic and contemporary understandings developed by Christian theorists, and an alternative principled basis for religious liberty, from a distinctively Christian position, is developed. Part Two analyses thevariety of stances the liberal state may take towards organised religions, and explains the nature of the guarantees for religious freedom in domestic and international law. The difficult question of precisely when and how far religious liberty should be limited is carefully analysed. Part Threedeals with concrete contemporary controversies involving the recognition and protection of religious beliefs and conduct, looking at issues such as family and parenting, medical treatment, education, employment, religious group autonomy, and freedom of expression and protest. Extensive reference is made throughout the analysis to UK law and the European Convention on Human Rights, also the laws of other jurisdictions such as the US, Canada, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand, making this a wide-ranging, timely, and thoughtful examination of a perplexing contemporarycontroversy.
See , e.g. , Sterling v . Interlake Indus . , Inc. , 154 F.R.D. 579 , 587 ( E.D.N.Y. 1994 ) . However , where a party's failure to disclose experts is inexcusable , courts will take the " drastic remedy ” to exclude the experts .
Collison , Cathy , 23 Colwell , Alan , 197 Coulson , Noel J. , 104 , 108 , 120 , 156 Cunneen , Chris , 299–302 D ... 122 , 139 , 237 Davidson , Robert , 245–47 del Frate , Anna Alvazzi , 38 Deloria , Vine Jr. , 94 Devine , F. E. , 13-15 ...
Summarizes important legal cases dealing with the Constitution, judicial power, war powers, federalism, taxes, state economic regulation, due process, and executive power
196. Id. at 813-16 (Scalia, J., dissenting) (citing Romero v. Int'l Terminal Operating Co., 358 U.S. 354 (1959); Lauritzen v. Larsen, 345 U.S. 571 (1953); Murray v. Schooner Charming Betsy, 6 U.S. (2 Cranch64)(l804)). 197. Id. at 8 1 7.
《中国法律制度》系统而简明地阐明了改革开放以来中国法律体系的建构过程,指出现在我国已经初步建成完备的社会主义法律制度,并指出中国法律制度进一步完善所需要努力的方 ...
(12)夏勇.“风险社会”中的“风险”辨析——刑法学研究中“风险”误区之澄清[J].中外法学.2012, (2):250—262. (13)赵书鸿.风险社会的刑法保护[J].人民检察.2008,(6):42—45. (14)郝艳兵.风险社会下的刑法价值观念及立法实践[J].中国刑事法杂志,2009,(7):15— 23.
... 3.02B n64; 3.02C n95; 3.02 n25; 6.02F n111 Messano v. Board of Educ., 161 A.2d 475, 32 NJ. 561 (1960) ..................... ..16.07 n135 Meyer; State v., 1 Kan. App. 2d 29, 561 P.2d 877 (1977) ..................... ..4.11 n403 ...
250 Hip, George '. , 357 Hip, Stephen 357 Hoeflich, Carl 019 Hoffman, Anthony 439 Hoffman, Carl '..-.' 358 Hoffman, Jury 358 Hoffman, Miehael 358 Hoffman, Phillip 619 Hoffman, Zachariah, Lieut 260, 261, 272, 274, 275, 790 Hogan, ...
New material, a new co-author, and a new student friendly uniform chaper organization highlight the second edition of this chapter organization highlight the seconde of of this incisive evidence casebook....
Created by an outstanding author team, Comprehensive Criminal Procedure fully reflects current thinking on investigative and adjudicative criminal procedure issues. By taking a fresh, how-to approach to the subject, the...