Courts in different jurisdictions face similar human rights questions. Does the death penalty breach human rights? Does freedom of speech include racist speech? Is there a right to health? This book uses the prism of comparative law to examine the fascinating ways in which these difficult questions are decided. On the one hand, the shared language of human rights suggests that there should be similar solutions to comparable problems. On the other hand, there are important differences. Constitutional texts are worded differently; courts have differing relationships with the legislature; and there are divergences in socio-economic development, politics, and history. Nevertheless, there is a growing transnational conversation between courts, with cases in one jurisdiction being cited in others. Part I sets out the cross-cutting themes which shape the ways judges respond to challenging human rights issues. It examines when it is legitimate to refer to foreign materials; how universality and cultural relativity are balanced in human rights law; the appropriate role of courts in adjudicating human rights in a democracy; and the principles judges use to interpret human rights texts. The book is unusual in transcending the distinction between socio-economic rights and civil and political rights. Part II applies these cross-cutting themes to comparing human rights law in the US, UK, South Africa, Canada, and India. Its focus is on seven particularly challenging issues: the death penalty, abortion, housing, health, speech, education and religion, with the aim of inspiring further comparative examination of other pressing human rights issues.
11 ( d ) Fortin , R. v . 782.1 Foster , R. v . ( 1992 ) , 109 N.S.R. ( 2d ) 57 ( C.A. ) 882 , 9 , 24 ( 2 ) Fosty , R. v . 2 ( a ) , 27 Four Star Management ...
dential commission investigating the Mooney case , and he filed a report to President Wilson charging that Mooney's conviction had been obtained by perjured testimony . In recommending to the President that Mooney be granted a new trial ...
CHARLES E WHITTAKER Rep . 1957-1962 Fed . judge ( 3 ) 1915-1985 Yale Ohio POTTER STEWART Rep . 1958–1981 City council ( 3 ) ; Fed . judge ( 4 ) 1917Yale Colo . JOHN F. KENNEDY Dem . 1961-1963 BYRON R. WHITE Dem . 1962Dep . U.S. Atty .
... 283, 304 Paul, John, 249, 250 Pearson, Conrad, 11, 254 Pearson, Levi, 154 Pennsylvania, race discrimination in, ... E. Barrett, Jr., 213 Prince Edward County, Virginia, desegregation case in, 162-63, 166; desegregation in, 249, 251; ...
So Nixon was ready for blood when he met at the White House early on the afternoon of July 24 with Ehrlichman and Krogh . While the President was out of the room for a moment , Krogh confided to Ehrlichman that Al Haig had predicted ...
MUDDATHIR ABD AL - RAHIM , R. Badel , Adlan Hardallo & P. Woodward ( eds . ) , Sudan Since Independence ( Aldershot , Gower ) 1986 . NIBLOCK , T. , Class and Power in Sudan . The Dynamics of Sudanese Politics , 1898-1985 ( London ...
United States, 1430 Bone marrow transplant, 1552 Bonham 's Case, 798 Bonnell v. Lorenzo, 20 Book(s) banning, 162-164 Board of Education v. Pico and, 163-164 burning, 162 on CIA, ... Alabama, 172 guilty pleas and, 718 Boynton v.
Simon Bolivar . New York : The Macmillan Company , 1942 . 5. “ WE DON'T LIKE YOUNG PEOPLE TO THINK " * de Polnay , Peter . Garibaldi . London : Hollis & Carter , 1960 . Ergang , Robert . Europe Since Waterloo .
These NGOs pointed out that the U . S . Act authorized the U . S . President to appropriate funds to support non ... Prospect It is uncertain whether the North Korea Human Rights Act will be passed in the House of Senate this year and ...
In contrast, in Buckley v UK, the applicant gypsy's right to respect for the home established on her land was not of manifest weight against the Court's consideration that in the area of planning controls national authorities are in ...