Forensic mental health assessment (FMHA) has grown into a specialization informed by research and professional guidelines. This series presents up-to-date information on the most important and frequently conducted forms of FMHA. The 19 topical volumes address best approaches to practice for particular types of evaluation in the criminal, civil, and juvenile/family areas. Each volume contains a thorough discussion of the relevant legal and psychological concepts, followed by a step-by-step description of the assessment process from preparing for the evaluation to writing the report and testifying in court. Volumes include the following helpful features: - Boxes that zero in on important information for use in evaluations - Tips for best practice and cautions against common pitfalls - Highlighting of relevant case law and statutes - Separate list of assessment tools for easy reference - Helpful gloassary of key terms for the particular topic In making recommendations for best practice, authors consider empirical support, legal relevance, and consistency with ethical and professional standards. These volumes offer invaluable guidance for anyone involved in conducting or using forensic evaluations. This book addresses the evaluation of criminals for capital sentencing, and looks at the history and importance of this process, the legal standards and the procedure for applying this evaluation in court. Established empirical foundations from the behavioral, social, and medical sciences are then presented. Finally, the book provides a detailed "how-to" for practitioners, including information on data collection, interpretation, report writing and expert testimony.
Forensic mental health assessment (FMHA) has grown into a specialization informed by research and professional guidelines. This series presents up-to-date information on the most important and frequently conducted forms of FMHA.
Referral Information Mr. J. Smith, a 58-year-old African American male, was ordered to undergo an evaluation of his competency to be executed by the Honorable J. H., U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, on November 30, 2009.
... to Discipline Unethical Prosecutors, 36 HOFSTRA L. REV. 275,278 (2007). 132. Marshall Hartman 8L Stephen L. Richards, The Illinois Death Penalty: What Went Wrong?, 34]. MARSHALL L. REV. 409, 423 (2001). 133. Brent E. Newton,A Case ...
This text provides an essential road map to forensic mental health assessments in death penalty cases for students and practitioners.
20. Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 (1985). 21. Ford. Notes 1. That issue was ultimately resolved in McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 (1987). 2. Wainwright v. Ford, 467 U.S. 1220 (1984). 3. Ford v. Wainwright, 752 F.2d 526 (1985).
The Second Edition of Forensic Mental Health Assessment is thoroughly updated in light of the developments and changes in the field, while still keeping the unique structure of presenting cases, detailed reports, and specific teaching ...
" The New England Law Review now offers its issues in convenient digital formats for e-reader devices, apps, pads, smartphones, and computers. This final issue of Volume 48, Summer 2014, contains articles by leading figures of the academy.
PMID: 4668419 Haines, Herbert H. Against capital punishment: the anti-death penalty movement in America, 1972-1994 / Herbert H. Haines. Published/Created: New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. Projected Pub.
Good,No Highlights,No Markup,all pages are intact, Slight Shelfwear,may have the corners slightly dented, may have slight color changes/slightly damaged spine.
In short, it explores the concept of (as termed by one chapter author) "protecting well-being while pursuing justice." Contributors to this important volume: Examine the effects of depression at different stages of legal procedure.