Chief Justice John Marshall argued that a constitution "requires that only its great outlines should be marked [and] its important objects designated." Ours is "intended to endure for ages to come, and consequently, to be adapted to the various crises of human affairs." In recent years, Marshall's great truths have been challenged by proponents of originalism and strict construction. Such legal thinkers as Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia argue that the Constitution must be construed and applied as it was when the Framers wrote it. In Keeping Faith with the Constitution, three legal authorities make the case for Marshall's vision. They describe their approach as "constitutional fidelity"--not to how the Framers would have applied the Constitution, but to the text and principles of the Constitution itself. The original understanding of the text is one source of interpretation, but not the only one; to preserve the meaning and authority of the document, to keep it vital, applications of the Constitution must be shaped by precedent, historical experience, practical consequence, and societal change. The authors range across the history of constitutional interpretation to show how this approach has been the source of our greatest advances, from Brown v. Board of Education to the New Deal, from the Miranda decision to the expansion of women's rights. They delve into the complexities of voting rights, the malapportionment of legislative districts, speech freedoms, civil liberties and the War on Terror, and the evolution of checks and balances. The Constitution's framers could never have imagined DNA, global warming, or even women's equality. Yet these and many more realities shape our lives and outlook. Our Constitution will remain vital into our changing future, the authors write, if judges remain true to this rich tradition of adaptation and fidelity.
The Washington Post Book World named The Idea That This is America one of the best books of 2007 When Army Captain Ian Fishback decided to blow the whistle on prisoner abuse in Iraq and Afghanistan, he posed the central question facing ...
Updegraff , 344 U.S. 183 ( 1952 ) , 256 Wilkinson v . Leland , 27 U.S. ( 2 Pet . ) 627 ( 1829 ) , 81 Vacco v . Quill , 117 S.Ct. 2293 ( 1997 ) , 398 Ex parte Vallandigham , 68 U.S. ( 1 Wall . ) ...
Paul G. Kauper & Stephen C. Ellis, Religious Corporations and the Law, 71 M those ICH. L. in R the EV. 1499, 1541-42 (1973). ... See PATRICK W. CAREY, PEOPLE, PRIESTS, AND PRELATES: E (U. CCLESIASTICAL Notre Dame Press DEMOCRACY 1987).
Every student of American history, ministers, and public speakers should read this book. . .
Refutes the claims of the religious right that America was founded as a Christian nation, and emphasizes that separation of church and state was designed to guarantee religious freedom The godless Constitution offers a bracing return to the ...
Caleb E. Mason, Faith, Harm, and Neutrality: Some Complexities of Free Exercise Law, 44 Duquesne L. Rev. 225, 262 n.116 (2006). 164. In Genesis 18, Abraham argues God down from his willingness to destroy Sodom if he cannot find fifty ...
The central subject of this book is an exploration of how theology engages with the dimension of practice in the life of the Church and contemporary society and culture.
This paperback edition features a new introduction examining the latest developments--which only highlight the prescience of Watson's arguments.
Argues that the Constitution serves as the focus of a civil religion and discusses the Constitution's components and interpretation
Contending for the Constitution is a companion volume to the popular work Defending the Declaration.