Public opinion polls are everywhere. Journalists report their results without hesitation, and political activists of all kinds spend millions of dollars on them, fueling the widespread assumption that elected officials "pander" to public opinion—that they tailor their policy decisions to the results of polls. In this provocative and engagingly written book, the authors argue that the reality is quite the opposite. In fact, when not facing election, contemporary presidents and members of Congress routinely ignore the public's policy preferences and follow their own political philosophies, as well as those of their party's activists, their contributors, and their interest group allies. Politicians devote substantial time, effort, and money to tracking public opinion, not for the purposes of policymaking, but to change public opinion—to determine how to craft their public statements and actions to win support for the policies they and their supporters want. Taking two recent, dramatic episodes—President Clinton's failed health care reform campaign, and Newt Gingrich's "Contract with America"—as examples, the authors show how both used public opinion research and the media to change the public's mind. Such orchestrated displays help explain the media's preoccupation with political conflict and strategy and, the authors argue, have propelled levels of public distrust and fear of government to record highs. Revisiting the fundamental premises of representative democracy, this accessible book asks us to reexamine whether our government really responds to the broad public or to the narrower interests and values of certain groups. And with the 2000 campaign season heating up, Politicians Don't Pander could not be more timely. "'Polling has turned leaders into followers,' laments columnist Marueen Dowd of The New York Times. Well, that's news definitely not fit to print say two academics who have examined the polls and the legislative records of recent presidents to see just how responsive chief executives are to the polls. Their conclusion: not much. . . . In fact, their review and analyses found that public opinion polls on policy appear to have increasingly less, not more, influence on government policies."—Richard Morin, The Washington Post
Health policy experts chart the stark disparities in health & wealth in the United States. The authors explain how the inequities arise, why they persist, & what makes them worse.
In Chapter 7, we test our pandering theory in a series of survey experiments in Canada, the United Kingdom, ... Thus, our third puzzle is how can our electoral pandering story explain the fact that incentives are higher in countries ...
Franck, The Tethered Presidency; and Robert J. Spitzer, President and Con— gress: Executive Hegemony at the Crossroads of American Government (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1993), p. xiv. 12. Jean Blondel, Political Leadership: ...
See, e.g., Buell 1975; Gustafson 1978; Hill 1981; Frantzich 1986; Thelen 1996; Sigelman and Walkosz 1991; and Hart 2000. 7. The study of constituency mail first appears in Public Opinion Quarterly in Anderson 1939; the special POQ issue ...
To answer these questions, Robert M. Entman develops a powerful new model of how media framing works—a model that allows him to explain why the media cheered American victories over small-time dictators in Grenada and Panama but barely ...
Who Leads Whom? is an ambitious study that addresses some of the most important questions in contemporary American politics: Do presidents pander to public opinion by backing popular policy measures that they believe would actually harm the ...
Journal of Broadcasting e'r Electronic Media, 53/1: 3—21. HoLBERT, R. L., TscHIDA, D. A., DIxoN, M., CHERRY, ... New Media Campaigns and the Managed Citizen. ... In Mass Communication Research: Major Issues and Future Directions, ed.
In The Obama Victory, Kate Kenski, Bruce Hardy, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson draw upon the best voter data available, The National Annenberg Election Survey, as well as interviews with key advisors to each campaign, to illuminate how media, ...
As Tom Nichols shows in The Death of Expertise, there are a number of reasons why this has occurred-ranging from easy access to Internet search engines to a customer satisfaction model within higher education.
Le Socialisme municipal devant le Conseil d'Etat: critique juridique et politique des régies communales. ... Montegut, Robert de Boyer. ... "Monographie historique et économique d'une capitale coloniale: Rabat de 1912 à 1939." 2 vols.