A great many theorists have argued that the defining feature of modernity is that people no longer believe in spirits, myths, or magic. Jason Ā. Josephson-Storm argues that as broad cultural history goes, this narrative is wrong, as attempts to suppress magic have failed more often than they have succeeded. Even the human sciences have been more enchanted than is commonly supposed. But that raises the question: How did a magical, spiritualist, mesmerized Europe ever convince itself that it was disenchanted? Josephson-Storm traces the history of the myth of disenchantment in the births of philosophy, anthropology, sociology, folklore, psychoanalysis, and religious studies. Ironically, the myth of mythless modernity formed at the very time that Britain, France, and Germany were in the midst of occult and spiritualist revivals. Indeed, Josephson-Storm argues, these disciplines’ founding figures were not only aware of, but profoundly enmeshed in, the occult milieu; and it was specifically in response to this burgeoning culture of spirits and magic that they produced notions of a disenchanted world. By providing a novel history of the human sciences and their connection to esotericism, The Myth of Disenchantment dispatches with most widely held accounts of modernity and its break from the premodern past.
The Myth of Disenchantment: Magic, Modernity, and the Birth of the Human Sciences
T.S. Elliot was also crucial in this movement. Eric Hirsch, Validity in Interpretation (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967). 43. C.K. Ogden and I.A. Richards, The Meaning of Meaning, 8th ed. (London: Kegan Paul, 1946), 1, 26.
Marcus follows the arc of The Great Gatsby from 1925 into the ways it has insinuated itself into works by writers such as Philip Roth and Raymond Chandler; found echoes in the work of performers from Jelly Roll Morton to Lana Del Rey; and ...
Müller had introduced the “science of religion” by stating that “we can hear in all religions . . . a longing after the Infinite, a love of God.”52 This was not lost on Müller's colleagues. William Elliot Griffis, one ...
Drawing on a wide range of early twentieth-century primary sources from theoretical physics, occultism, embryology, radioactivity, psychical research, and other fields, Asprem casts the intellectual life of high modernity as a synchronic ...
This book provides an in-depth ethnographic study of science and religion in the context of South Asia, giving voice to Indian scientists and shedding valuable light on their engagement with religion.
Yet this notion of magic has remained stubbornly amorphous. In Making Magic, Randall Styers seeks to account for the extraordinary vitality of scholarly discourse purporting to define and explain magic despite its failure to do just that.
Hughes, 1764), preface. Cf. jones, Hieroglyfic (London: printed by j. Hughes, 1768), 11—12. For a discussion of jones, see Murray Cohen, Sensible Words: Linguistic Practice in England, 1640—1785 (Baltimore: johns Hopkins University ...
Two texts, Helen R. Lucero and Suzanne Baizerman's Chimayó Weaving: The Transformation of a Tradition and Charles Briggs's The Wood Carvers of Córdova, New Mexico: The Social Dimensions of an Artistic “Revival,” illustrate a profound ...
A new translation of two celebrated lectures on politics, academia, and the disenchantment of the world. The German sociologist Max Weber is one of the most venturesome, stimulating, and influential theorists of the modern condition.