This book continues and revises the ideas of justice as fairness that John Rawls presented in A Theory of Justice but changes its philosophical interpretation in a fundamental way. That previous work assumed what Rawls calls a "well-ordered society," one that is stable and relatively homogenous in its basic moral beliefs and in which there is broad agreement about what constitutes the good life. Yet in modern democratic society a plurality of incompatible and irreconcilable doctrines—religious, philosophical, and moral—coexist within the framework of democratic institutions. Recognizing this as a permanent condition of democracy, Rawls asks how a stable and just society of free and equal citizens can live in concord when divided by reasonable but incompatible doctrines? This edition includes the essay "The Idea of Public Reason Revisited," which outlines Rawls' plans to revise Political Liberalism, which were cut short by his death. "An extraordinary well-reasoned commentary on A Theory of Justice...a decisive turn towards political philosophy." —Times Literary Supplement
In this unique volume, some of today's most eminent political philosophers examine the thought of John Rawls, focusing in particular on his most recent work.
Leading figures in politics and philosophy revitalize Rawls's prescription for a just society.
In her introduction to the volume, Martha Nussbaum discusses the main themes of Political Liberalism and puts them into the context of contemporary philosophical debates.
The natural - rights teaching enshrined in the Declaration of Independence on which American institutions rest is neither libertarian ( in Nozick's sense ) nor socialist . On the one hand , the Lockean property - rights doctrine ...
Human beings, by contrast, are not as such subordinate to human beings, or only so for the sake of all involved, as children are subject to parents and slaves to masters, for both are preserved and enhanced by such subjection.
It really is liberalism for the liberals and cannibalism for the cannibals! More pressingly, it also means that in multicultural societies there is no possibility of impartial reasons for arbitrating between the claims of rival groups.
This volume brings together ten of Paul Weithman's papers on John Rawls's liberalism and his defense of reasonable political faith.
There are many books about liberalism, but no defence of radical critique that treats liberal theory with the depth, breadth and intensity of this work.
Without claiming that this is the only possible categorization of liberalism, he argues that this subdivision is the most comprehensible way out of liberal confusion.
reformer and campaigner for child benefit in Britain, Eleanor Rathbone. ... With “social cooperation” in a liberal-democratic setting, Popper considered, the remaining evils of poverty, material inequity, and educational backwardness ...