There is no constitutional right to physician-assisted suicide says the U.S. Supreme Court. Most states have laws against it, but states can also allow it, as Oregon has done; others are considering legalization. Still very little guidance has been offered about its practice. Assisted Suicide: Finding Common Ground fills that void. A diverse group of experts—some for, some against—provide a framework for thinking about what assisted suicide, particularly physician-assisted suicide, is and how its legalized practice might be guided. The book does not take a position on the continuing debate about the morality or wisdom of legalizing assisted suicide. But physician-assisted suicide is now taking place, and the more pressing concerns are those pertaining to its implementation. Editors Lois Snyder and Art Caplan attempt to find common ground on those real-world concerns. Among the questions asked and answered are: What is assisted suicide? Is physician-assisted suicide different from refusal of treatment? Are there alternatives to assisted suicide? How useful are currently available guidelines for physician-assisted suicide? Who should have access to what? Does assisted suicide necessarily mean physician-assisted suicide? Can the practice be effectively and meaningfully regulated? How should physicians respond to requests for assisted suicide? Assisted suicide is one of the most ethically challenging issues in medicine and bioethics, defining who we are and want to be as individuals and as a society. This book takes a hard look at alternatives to the practice, the implications for the patient-physician relationship, who should write guidelines, and how to regulate physician-assisted suicide and establish safeguards so that it is voluntary and an option of last resort.
Indeed , Justice Scalia reacted strongly to Justice Brennan's dissent in Cruzan , where his colleague had proclaimed that “ The State has no legitimate general interest in someone's life completely abstracted from the interest of the ...
Presents an examination of the issues and of current practices and law relating to assisted suicide and euthanasia in Ontario.
14 Maggie Gallagher , “ Is it a Right to Die or a Right to Kill ? ” Universal Press Syndicate , March 1996 . 15 The Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs of the American Medical Association . Also stated in the American College of ...
21 Back AL, Wallance JI, Starks HE et al. Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in Washington State. Patient requests and physician responses. JAMA. 1996; 275: 919–25. 22 Wilson KG, Curran D, McPherson CJ.
Sullivan , Amy D. , Katrina Hedberg , and David Hopkins . 2001. Legalized PhysicianAssisted Suicide in Oregon , 1998–2000 . New England Journal of Medicine 344 ( 8 ) : 605-7 . Suo , Steve . 1995. House OK's Bareheaded Bikers .
Report of the Select Committee on Medical Ethics
J.K. Mason and D. Mulligan propose that euthanasia be introduced by stages . 62 It should be made available first , they say , for people suffering from specific conditions.63 The two conditions they suggest are permanent vegetative ...
Dr. Linda Emanuel--one of America's most influential medical ethicists--has assembled leading experts to provide not only a clear account of the arguments for and against physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia but also historical, ...
Enjeux éthiques liés au don d'organes en contexte d'aide médicale à mourir: supplément à l'avis sur le don et la...
Of course, the physician's presence at the time the technology was removed—doing something that directly leads to the patient's death—is what made the action unacceptable. If a physician turned off an implanted pacemaker and the patient ...