We are taught in civics class that the Constitution provides for three basic branches of government: executive, judicial, and legislative. While the President and Congress as elected by popular vote are representative, can they really reflect accurately the will and sentiment of the populace? Or do money and power dominate everyday politics to the detriment of true self-governance? Is there a way to put &"We the people&" back into government? Ethan Leib thinks there is and offers this blueprint for a fourth branch of government as a way of giving the people a voice of their own. While drawing on the rich theoretical literature about deliberative democracy, Leib concentrates on designing an institutional scheme for embedding deliberation in the practice of American democratic government. At the heart of his scheme is a process for the adjudication of issues of public policy by assemblies of randomly selected citizens convened to debate and vote on the issues, resulting in the enactment of laws subject both to judicial review and to possible veto by the executive and legislative branches. The &"popular&" branch would fulfill a purpose similar to the ballot initiative and referendum but avoid the shortcomings associated with those forms of direct democracy. Leib takes special pains to show how this new branch would be integrated with the already existing governmental and political institutions of our society, including administrative agencies and political parties, and would thus complement rather than supplant them.
In "What Deliberative Democracy Means," which opens this collection of essays, they provide the most accessible exposition of deliberative democracy to date.
... 70, 72, 79–82, 145–46 town meetings, 14, 20–23, 91, 138, 155 traditional talking, 25, 36–37, 43, 46, 49–50, 52, 54–57, 153, 189n5 Transue, John, 2 Traugott, Michael, 89 Trope, Yaacov, 68 Tulis, Jeffery, 7 Turner, J. C., 69 Tyler, ...
... he claimed, instead “making savage wars more savage and more frequent, and adding new and fierce passions to the contests of barbarians” (47). Webster understood barbarism as an uncivil state, not a racial characteristic.
In this book, Christopher F. Zurn shows why a normative theory of deliberative democratic constitutionalism yields the best understanding of the legitimacy of constitutional review.
Emphasizing citizenship, the text examines the way that civic culture and immigration impact students and shape the country. It offers solid historical coverage and a close look at civic responsibility.
This Election Update edition of Bessette/Pitney's AMERICAN GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS: DELIBERATION, DEMOCRACY AND CITIZENSHIP, No Separate Policy chapter version, is complete with 2010 election information.
Emphasizing citizenship, the text examines the way that civic culture and immigration impact students and shape the country. It offers solid historical coverage and a close look at civic responsibility.
To consider whether democracy and associations can still be positively linked, Maria Hoyt Cashin considers lessons drawn from the League of Women Voters.
Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, and John Jay. [1788] 1961. The Federalist Papers. Clinton Rossiter (ed.) New York: New American Library. Hansen, Susan B. 1997. “Talking about Politics: Gender and Contextual Effects on Political ...
Hearing the Other Side examines this theme in the context of the contemporary United States. It is unique in its effort to link political theory with empirical research.