Countering the atheist claim that believers are by default violent fanatics and religion is the cause of all major wars, this book demonstrates that religious faith is not inherently violent. In fact, the world's major religions have throughout their history displayed ambivalent attitudes towards aggression and warfare. At times they have allied themselves with states and empires for protection or to further their influence; at others they have tried to curb state oppression and aggression and worked for peace and justice. Taking us on a journey from prehistoric times to the present, this book contrasts medieval crusaders and modern-day jihadists with the pacifism of the Buddha and Jesus' vision of a just and peaceful society; moreover, it demonstrates that the underlying reasons - social, economic, political - for war and violence in our history often had very little to do with religion. While human beings have a natural propensity for aggression, collective violence and warfare emerged at a certain point in history when the invention of agriculture created a society and a state based on the accumulation of wealth. For most of history our destructive potential could be contained but with the industrialised warfare and all-powerful state of the modern age, humanity is on the brink of destroying itself. Vast in scope, impeccably researched and passionately argued, this book is more than a corrective to the prevailing view that religion is to blame for most of the bloodshed throughout human history: it is a celebration of those religious ideas and movements that have opposed war and aggression and promoted peace and reconciliation.
Houte, Soetken van den Huai Valley (China) Huang Di, see Yellow Emperor Hudaybiyyah, Well of (Arabia), 7.1, 11.1 Huguenots Hulugu humanism, 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 10.1, 10.2 Humbaba Hume, David Hundred Years' War Hungary, 8.1, 8.2 Husain (third ...
"One of the best history books I've read in the last few years." —Chris Hayes The previously untold story of the violence in Congress that helped spark the Civil War In The Field of Blood, Joanne B. Freeman recovers the long-lost story of ...
Fields of Blood: The Book of War provides everything you need to rule a nation, raise an army, and assault your enemies on the battlefield.
Infused with Mina's unique blend of dark humor, personal insights and social injustice, the story grips the reader while challenging our perceptions of childhood innocence, crime and punishment, and right or wrong.
Hindman to Marmaduke, 14 Nov., and to John W. Dunnington, 25 Oct., Dunnington to Hindman, 1 Nov., Holmes to Hindman, 2 Nov., ... Keller noted that 83 of the 1,259 patients admitted to the hospital on Mulberry Creek had died ...
"Combining the thoughtful use of theory with a vivid historical ethnography, this is an important, courageous, and pioneering work which opens up the whole issue of nation-building in northern Greece."—Mark Mazower, University of Sussex
Prize-winning journalist and Nieman Fellow Julia Reynolds tells the gang's story from the inside out, following young men and women as they search for a new kind of family, quests that usually lead to murder and betrayal.
I talk about what's wrong with Constance Webb's book and Fabre's book. Fabre's book was written in the shadow ofthe widow. She determined what should go in that book. He was indebted to her. He wanted to please her.
The Eden story is certainly not a morality tale; like any paradise myth, it is an imaginary account of the infancy of the human race. In Eden, Adam and Eve are still in the womb; they have to grow up, and the snake is there to guide ...