12.08[2][g][iii] Hopkins v. Akins, 637 A.2d 424 (D.C. 1993) . . . . 12.02[4][b]; 12.04[3][e] n20; 12.07[6][c] [ii]; 20.08[5] Hopkins, In re, 677 A.2d 55 (D.C. 1996) .... 12.04[3][e] n21 Hopkins, In re, 687 A.2d 938 (D.C. 1996) .
Casenote Legal Briefs. 94 ... Burkin. Widow (P) v. Successor trustree (D) Mass. Sup. Jud. Ct., 460 N.E.2d 572 (1984) ... Sullivan (P) contended that the value of real estate placed in trust by her late husband should be considered part ...
Sup. Ct. 2002). 94 Sitkoff/Dukeminier, Wills, Trusts, and Estates, 624: „The hard policy question raised by mandatory arbitration provisions is whether accountability in court, before a judge, is part of that essential core.