Big Brother and the National Reading Curriculum: How Ideology Trumped Evidence

Big Brother and the National Reading Curriculum: How Ideology Trumped Evidence
ISBN-10
0325005133
ISBN-13
9780325005133
Category
Education / Educational Policy & Reform / General
Pages
304
Language
English
Published
2002
Publisher
Pearson Education Canada
Author
Richard L. Allington

Description

New legislation will transform American public education. Basic to the No Child Left Behind Act and the Put Reading First program is a new and substantial federal intrusion into local curriculum control and teacher autonomy. This intrusion is masked in the legislative mandate for "evidence-based", or "scientific", reading instruction. Beyond the distortions of the findings of the National Reading Panel Report that undergird the new federal initiatives, there are other federal mandates, past and current, that have also impeded improving reading instruction - and worse, the public education system - through privatization, teacher disempowerment, and a systemic business model.

In this timely and important book, nationally-recognized reading researcher Richard Allington tracks and questions the 30-year campaign that has focused on testing, accountability, and federalization of education. He and other educators, including Jim Cunningham, Michael Pressley, Elaine Garan, and Patrick Shannon, have contributed articles that provide an overview of past and recent federal education policies, including the NRP Report and associated legislation and policy making, with analyses of the premises of the new national reading plan. By showing how these premises are manufactured - that is, not reliably supported by the research - they explain why this plan is an unwarranted federal encroachment into local educational decision making.

Similar books

  • Improving Perkins II Performance Measures and Standards: Lessons Learned from Early Implementers in Four States
    By Brian M. Stecher, Rand Corporation

    The Carl D. Perkins Vocational and Applied Technology Education Act of 1990 required states to develop outcome-based accountability systems built around statewide performance measures and standards.

  • 大學整併:成效、問題與展望
    By 李懿芳, 黃政傑, 王振輝

    大學整併在二十一世紀全球高等教育中已蔚為潮流,各國大學透過不同樣態的整併,致力於擴展辦學規模,提升品質,以期增進學術影響力,在全球嚴峻的大學競爭中,站穩一席之地 ...

  • 教育政策與前瞻創新
    By 梁金盛, 吳清基, 顏國樑

    參後現代主義知識論的代表人物及其主要論點對教育行政領域有影響力的後現代主義派別,分別有:後結構主義〔post-structuralism,以傅柯(Foucault)、李歐塔(Lyotard)與德希達(Derrida)等人為代表〕、新實用主義(neo-pragmatism,由美國哲學大師羅逖 Rorty 所 ...

  • 好教师会讲课——三尺讲台有乾坤
    By 司德平主编

    课堂教学总是在变与不变中行进。2017年,教育部部长陈宝生提出了“课堂革命”,指出“我们的课堂革命需要:心灵的革命、观念的革命、技术的革命和行动的革命”。这就要求我们每一位教师要进一步回归、深刻理解教育,重新认识教与学的本质。优秀的教师既能立足自身 ...

  • Achieving High Educational Standards for All: Conference Summary
    By Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Catherine E. Snow

    Conference Summary National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education Catherine E. Snow, Christopher Edley, Jr., Timothy Ready. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10256.html ...

  • 行政改革与人力资源管理研究
    By 张茜著

    本书首先从高校行政改革概况着手,指出当前高校行政管理的现状及问题,然后对高校权力体制改革、运行模式改革和管理机制改革三个方面进行具体分析。随着高校行政的改革,人 ...

  • 微课程设计方法与教学研究
    By 李丽

    微课程作为一种现代化的教育新形式,在教学中取得了良好的效果。在教学中运用微课程,一方面帮助教师突破教学中的困难,另一方面促进学生能力和技能的提高。本书主要是针对 ...

  • Rediscovering the Democratic Purposes of Education
    By Roger W. Benjamin, P. Michael Timpane, M. McDonnell

    Why do America's public schools seem unable to meet today's social challenges? As competing interest groups vie over issues like funding and curricula, we seem to have lost sight of...

  • Education and Social Change
    By Amanda Coffey

    This text undertakes a systematic sociological analysis of contemporary educational policy and practice. In doing so it charts the substantial and significant changes that education systems have undergone over recent...

  • Changing Urban Education
    By Clarence Nathan Stone

    With critical issues like desegregation and funding facing our schools, dissatisfaction with public education has reached a new high. Teachers decry inadequate resources while critics claim educators are more concerned...