Key Cases is the essential series for anyone studying law, including A Level, LLB, ILEX and post-graduate conversion courses. Understanding and memorising leading cases fully is a vital part of the study of law - the clear format, style and explanations of Key Cases will ensure you achieve this. Key Cases provides the simplest and most effective way for you to memorise and absorb the essential cases needed to pass your exams. Key Features: * All essential and leading cases explained * User-friendly layout and style * Cases broken down into key components by use of a clear symbol system Additional high-quality revision material is provided on the interactive website a href="http://www.hodderplus.co.uk/law/login.asp?page=%2Flaw%2Findex%2Easpandwebsitename="www.unlockingthelaw.co.uk/a
On 23 December 1998 both Mr Peter Mandelson, Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, and Mr Geoffrey Robinson, the Paymaster-General, both resigned. The ostensible reason was a possible allegation of 'sleaze' in that Mr Robinson had ...
The New Constitutional and Administrative Law: Constitutional law
Of interest or benefit to: Students, Academics, Lawyers
A thorough and accessible introduction to the basic legal principles of the UK constitution. This ninth edition has been fully updated to reflect latest developments.
Constitutional and Administrative Law: Basic Principles
At its heart however, the book remains a student textbook with one fundamental aim; to provide all law students with a readable and comprehensive grounding in Public Law suitable for use on both first year modules, and more advanced courses ...
Having undergone a rigorous editing process to offer a more concise account of public law today, contemporary developments covered in this edition include the UK's first coalition government for nearly 60 years, and recent proposals to ...
Constitutional and Administrative Law
The same point was put more succinctly by Mr Sullivan QC, who appeared for the council—'The club failed to align themselves whole-heartedly with the council on a controversial issue.
Yet the Illinois Supreme Court, its unanimous opinion delivered by Thompson CJ, held that the city could do nothing at all to suppress the dissemination of such stories. The judgment was formally rooted in Art 2, s 4 of the Illinois ...