There is no end in sight to the frequency with which physicians, nursing professionals and other healthcare providers will become lawsuit targets in our litigious society. While politicians, practitioners, insurance companies and trial attorneys debate the nation's chronic malpractice crisis, suits continue to be filed. In addition, once COVID-19 is behind us and the unprecedented public support for health care providers wanes, as it will, it is anticipated that physicians and nurses will become malpractice defendants to a remarkable degree. National legislative fact-finding committees and investigative bodies, which may be charged with the responsibility of pursuing a solution, likely will never achieve a global remedy. Although curtailed by some states, national legislation has not addressed baseless malpractice suites or grossly excessive monetary verdicts. Another approach exists, however. Health care providers can impact the existing system and influence the malpractice environments in a tangible, positive and powerful fashion. Although there will be debate over tort reform in order to bring some degree of protection to the malpractice defendant, individual case success, defined from the defendant's perspective as a no-cause trial verdict, can be realized if well-credentialed and experienced health care professionals are willing to assist the malpractice defense bar as expert witnesses. The benefits to the health care community and the individuals who are willing to participate are innumerable and worth considering.
Principles in Practice Todd L. Archibald, James Cooper Morton ... Toronto Belt Line Railway ( 1912 ) , 21 O.W.R. 348 at 350 ( Master ) ( Master Cartwright ) ; Inglis v . James Richardson & Sons Ltd. ( 1912 ) , 4 O.W.N. 23 ( Master ) ...
Designed to be used in conjunction with the Connecticut Practice Book and the Connecticut General Statutes, this exceptionally practical, how-to guide to civil litigation in Connecticut provides a unique overall picture of the litigation ...
These are raised by Kidder , but have also been discussed within CLRP and by others , including Tushnet ( 1980 ) and ... s Of course , there is always an additional risk that the presence of the researcher will alter decisions the ...
33, see Cain v Francis & McKay v Hamlani [2008] EWCA 1451.) See also paragraph 7.4.4. 7.4.6.7 Practical pointers when calculating the limitation period As stated, time 'runs' from the day following the day of accrual of the action.
Litigation privilege can normally be claimed in proceedings in which a judicial function is being exercised, but if the proceedings are merely fact-finding (for example, an inquiry under the Banking Acts—see the Three Rivers case again) ...
Civil Litigation Conference, 2000: Materials Prepared for the Continuing Legal Education Seminar, the Third Biennial Civil Litigation Conference, Held in...
Asbestos Litigation in the United Kingdom: An Interim Report
Cross-border Litigation: Environmental Rights in the Great Lakes Ecosystem
The text is ideal for students taking the Legal Practice Course or relevant LLB or LLM modules and features case studies on both a personal injury matter and a commercial matter, making it suitable for students with either a high street or ...
This review investigated the nature of sexual harassment in employment that is being reported to HREOC by analysing complaints made to HREOC.