Stifling Political Competition examines the history and array of laws, regulations, subsidies and programs that benefit the two major parties and discourage even the possibility of a serious challenge to the Democrat-Republican duopoly. The analysis synthesizes political science, economics and American history to demonstrate how the two-party system is the artificial creation of a network of laws, restrictions and subsidies that favor the Democrats and Republicans and cripple potential challenges. The American Founders, as it has been generally forgotten, distrusted political parties. Nowhere in the U.S. Constitution are parties mentioned, much less given legal protection or privilege. This provocative book traces how by the end of the Civil War the Republicans and Democrats had guaranteed their dominance and subsequently influenced a range of policies developed to protect the duopoly. For example, Bennett examines how the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (as amended in 1974 and 1976), which was sold to the public as a nonpartisan act of good government reformism actually reinforced the dominance of the two parties. While focused primarily on the American experience, the book does consider the prevalence of two-party systems around the world (especially in emerging democracies) and the widespread contempt with which they are often viewed. The concluding chapter considers the potential of truly radical reform toward opening the field to vigorous, lively, contentious third-party candidacies that might finally offer alienated voters a choice, not an echo.
See office-seeking politicians Carmichael, Stokely, 112 Caro, Robert A., 101 carpetbaggers, 74, 76, 80, 260n12 Carson, Jamie, 93 Carter, Jimmy, 129, 231, 267n8 Cass, Lewis, 69 Caughey, Devin, 34, 257n29 Charleston, SC, 42, 48, ...
THE INSTITUTE FOR POLITICAL INNOVATION The authors will donate all royalties from the sale of this book to the Institute for Political Innovation.
This book is the first comprehensive comparative analysis of the key issues, actors, and trends in these elections over the last quarter century. The book asks: what motivates African citizens to vote? What issues do candidates campaign on?
... stifling of free speech. Such regulation would be ineffective in any case because politicians can communicate via ... political party, which stifles political competition. Regulation rewards dishonest politicians and parties because it ...
The first is the frequent degeneration of political pluralism and democratic discussions into scandals related to the ... and not by an invitation for tenders, the scandal was brought to public attention and the media reported daily on ...
... political competition and evidence of the characteristics borne by a ... political and economic competition. This is not to say elections were falsified but ... stifle political competition and control over the civil service and render ...
This book highlights the main factors determining the quality of public administration in conflict affected countries; and assesses to what extent the conflict determines and impacts on the performance of public administration in affected ...
Nelson W. Aldrich, Old Money: The Mythology of Wealth in America (New York: Allworth Press, 1997), p. 246. John Harper, “Yankee Stadium Opens,” www.nydailynews.com. Harvey Frommer, “Remembering Yankee Stadium: Opening Day 1923,” http:// ...
Freedom in the World is the standard-setting comparative assessment of global political rights and civil liberties.
... political competition is , possibly , even stronger . It is not merely personal dictatorships that are likely to be ... stifling , and ulti- mately oppressive . Political competition enables citizens in the long run to change their ...