The text explains and discusses the common law rules of evidence as affected by the Evidence Act 1906 (WA). The commentary addresses the synthesis of the common law and statutory position to provide a very readable and accessible text that applies a logical and systematic approach to the introduction of each key topic. The easy-to-navigate design supports a clear discussion and analysis of statutory provisions and leading cases to engage readers. To consolidate understanding, each chapter provides a set of self-test questions and a problem question in each of the civil and criminal jurisdictions. To promote familiarity with the evidence rules applicable to practice in federal matters, the text also includes a comparative discussion of the position under the Commonwealth Evidence Act 1995, which forms the foundation of the Uniform Evidence Acts regime. This book is an ideal introduction for students to the law of evidence and an excellent reference for Western Australian legal practitioners. Related Titles Field, LexisNexis Questions and Answers: Evidence for Common Law States, 2nd ed, 2011 Field, LexisNexis Questions and Answers: Uniform Evidence Law, 2012 Field, LexisNexis Case Summaries: Evidence for Common Law States, 2012 Anderson, Williams & Clegg, The New Law of Evidence, 2nd ed, 2009 Ligertwood & Edmond, Australian Evidence, 5th ed, 2010
R v Campbell (2007) FACTS: The defendant was charged with false imprisonment and assault against a woman with whom he had a sexual relationship. The prosecution was permitted to adduce evidence of recent crimes of violence against ...
An illustration of the application of section 74(1) may be found in R v Robertson. Robertson was charged with conspiring with Poole and Long to commit burglaries. Poole and Long pleaded guilty to relevant substantive counts of burglary, ...
He argued that Officer Moore was mistaking him for a man named David Bailey, with whom he was playing dice around the time of the sale. Mr. Copelin and his corroborating witnesses testified that they had seen Mr. Bailey repeatedly leave ...
Hallmark features of An Analytical Approach to Evidence: Text, Problems, and Cases: An opening transcript from an actual criminal law case illustrates how evidence is admitted and excluded in practice--Chapter Two on the trial process can ...
In Powell v. State,266 the accused was charged with indecency with a child. The prosecution introduced testimony from six witnesses to the effect that they too had been victims of the accused's acts, on the argument that the evidence of ...
Lowery , 6.9 n.255 Turner v . Safley , 5.3 n.267 ; 6.2 n.262 6.12 nn.26 , 169 , 195 , 263 , 430 Tornay v . United States , 6.7 nn.77,96 Torres v . INS , 5.4 n.51 Torres v . Kuzniasz , 6.12 nn.272 , 276 Torres v .
As the prosecution points out , Sullivan's direct testimony raised the issue of his credibility to the jury . Sullivan's credibility was in fact the central issue litigated in the case , as the defense presented only Sullivan and the ...
Maryland Evidence Handbook
Maryland Evidence Handbook
Evidence of Opinion and Expert Evidence