Offers a thorough and perceptive treatment of modern English trust law Uniquely combines textbook and casebook in one compact volume Uses questions and problems at the end of each chapter to promote analysis and discussion Investigates the grey areas often favoured by examiners Illuminates the nature of the English trust concept with comparative references to foreign jurisdictions Illustrates text with excerpts from cases, statutes, articles, Government White Papers, Charity Commissioners' Reports and Decisions and Attorney-General's Guidelines
A guide for non-tax specialist commercial lawyers to help manage the tax issues which arise in a wide range of commercial transactions.
Cases and Commentary on the Law of Trusts
As a textbook combined with a sourcebook, this well-established work on modern English trust law not only offers two books for the price of one, but also illuminates the topics covered by a careful arrangement of text and materials.
This work introduces and discusses the main principles and remedies of Anglo-Australian equity for students.
1124 Attorney-General v Ross [1986] 1 WLR 252', [1985] 3All ER 334 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1114, 1127 Attorney-General v Shrewsbury Corp (1843) 6 Beav 220 .
Harries v Church Commissioners [1992] 1 WLR 1241 The Church Commissioners are the trustees of the Church of england. They already had an ethical investment policy and already avoided investments in armaments, gambling, alcohol, tobacco, ...
The fourth edition has been fully revised and consolidated to include recent developments in case law and legislation, including discussion on: charitable trusts in the light of the Charities Act 2013 (Cth) Andrews v ANZ Banking Group Ltd ...
Compare Fox J's and Lord Russell's analysis of the consequences of the power of accumulation with that of Viscount Dilhorne: Pearson v IRC [1979] 1 All ER 273 at 281 Fox]: The position as to the trustees' power of accumulation, ...
Linked together by Gary Watt's engaging commentary, this is an essential resource for a subject that is heavily case law based.
Restitutionary awards for unjust enrichment and for wrongdoing are clearly recognised for what they are. But these are recent developments.