With the end of the Cold War and the visibility of U.S. Patriot missile defenses during the 1991 Gulf War, the cost and benefits of ballistic missile defense systems (BMD) need to be re-evaluated. In this detailed and balanced study, David Denoon assesses new types of short-range and intercontinental missile defenses. In the post Cold War era, two fundamental changes have made missile defense for the United States and its military forces more compelling: The United States and Russia no longer see each other as direct threats and there has been a dramatic proliferation of ballistic missile capability in the Third World. Consequently, U.S. forces deployed overseas are more likely to be at risk and, eventually, the United States itself could become vulnerable to missile threats. With these changes in mind, David Denoon analyzes the current BMD dilemma, arguing that active defenses against missiles should be seen as a form of insurance against catastrophe. He assesses the likelihood of missile attacks and the appropriate level of investment for the United States to defend against such attacks. The book provides an assessment of deterrence and the performance of the Patriot missiles during the 1991 Gulf War, critiques the Strategic Defense Initiative, and analyzes the prospects for new types of short-range and intercontinental missile defenses.
START and Beyond: Strategic Nuclear Arms Reductions in the Post-Cold War Era
Finally, the book examines the utility of models, games, and simulations as decision aids in improving the naval forces' understanding of situations in which deterrence must be used and in improving the potential success of deterrence ...
This book examines the transformation in US thinking about the role of Ballistic Missile Defence (BMD) in national security policy since the end of the Cold War.
Requirements for Ballistic Missile Defenses: Hearing Before the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourth Congress, First...
This original collection of essays offers hope to those who believe that the cause of world peace requires a new American foreign policy and repairing our depleted military.
neglected clear evidence of hard balancing against US-based unipolarity, with BMD emerging as the major impetus for ... the drivers of missile defense and its consequences since 1945, with a particular focus on the post-cold War era.
James Addison Baker III graduated from Princeton University in 1952 and then joined the Marine Corps. After his discharge, he entered the law school at the University of Texas in Austin, where he earned a doctorate in 1957.
Originally published in 1997, this hitherto hard-to-find study examines the impact that construction of radar stations and command facilities had on the American landscape. With accompanying black and white photographs...
How this surge in power is accommodated by the incumbent powers like the United States and Japan, and how the new regional powers like China and India manage the power politics that emerge will be the key determinants of regional stability ...
Yet this is more than a story about Canadian policy toward self-defence as told through its five-decade-long confrontation with ballistic missile defence in a world of Cold War nuclear deterrence and post-Cold War proliferation concerns ...