The Soviet Union was hardly the first large, continuous, land-based, multinational empire to collapse in modern times. The USSR itself was, ironically, the direct result of one such demise, that of imperial Russia, which in turn was but one of several other such empires that did not survive the stresses of the times: the Austro-Hungarian Empire of the Habsburgs and the Ottoman Empire.This ambitious and important volume brings together a group of some of the most outstanding scholars in political science, history, and historical sociology to examine the causes of imperial decline and collapse. While they warn against facile comparisons, they also urge us to step back from the immediacy of current events to consider the possible significance of historical precedents.Is imperial decline inevitable, or can a kind of imperial stasis be maintained indefinitely? What role, if any, does the growth of bureaucracies needed to run large and complex political systems of this type play in economic and political stagnation? What is the balance of power" between the centre and the peripheries, between the dominant nationality and minorities? What coping mechanisms do empires tend to develop and what influence do these have? Is modernization the inexorable source of imperial decline and ultimate collapse? And what resources, including the imperial legacy, are available for political, social, and economic reconstruction in the aftermath of collapse? These are just a few of the tantalizing questions addressed by the contributors to this fascinating and timely volume.
Drawing on texts from the writings of Fanon and Orwell to Ali G. and The Office, After Empire, Paul Gilroy explores Britain's failure to come to terms with the loss of its empire and pre-eminent global standing.
Adom Getachew shows that African, African American, and Caribbean anticolonial nationalists were not solely or even primarily nation-builders.
A historian and anthropologist uses demographic and economic factors to explain the waning hegemony of the United States.
28 For a more detailed discussion of the differences between the two texts, see Richard Wall, “An Giall and the Hostage Compared.” Modern Drama 18, no. 2 (1975): 165–172. 29 Brendan Behan, “The Hostage,” in Behan: The Complete Plays, ...
The essays in this volume explore the diverse repercussions of this event, tracing the diplomatic, intellectual, and sociocultural histories that have emanated from it.
71–76 Thompson, D. J., “Egypt, 146–31 b.c.,” in J. A. Crook, A. Lintott, and E. Rawson (eds.), Cambridge Ancient History2 9 (Cambridge: 1994), pp. 310–326 Thompson, D. J., “The Ptolemies and Egypt,” in A. Erskine (ed.) ...
A pioneering comparative history of European decolonization from the formal ending of empires to the postcolonial European present.
This book makes the case that the idea of a "world" in the cultural and philosophical sense is not an exclusively Western phenomenon.
Ranging from the literature and history of empire to analyses of contemporary culture, postcolonial writing, political rhetoric, and postimperial memory after 9/11, this collection demonstrates that far from being parochial or self-involved ...
For those who seek a way to affirm and embody a positive ethic in a time of conflict, war, and division, Welch offers this workbook for new human community.