Even as lawsuits challenging its admissions policies made their way through the courts, the University of Michigan carried the torch for affirmative action in higher education. In June 2003, the Supreme Court vindicated UM's position on affirmative action when it ruled that race may be used as a factor for universities in their admissions programs, thus confirming what the UM had argued all along: diversity in the classroom translates to a beneficial and wide-ranging social value. With the green light given to the law school's admissions policies, Defending Diversity validates the positive benefits gained by students in a diverse educational setting. Written by prominent University of Michigan faculty, Defending Diversity is a timely response to the court's ruling. Providing factual background, historical setting, and the psychosocial implications of affirmative action, the book illuminates the many benefits of a diverse higher educational setting -- including preparing students to be full participants in a pluralistic democracy -- and demonstrates why affirmative action is necessary to achieve that diversity. Defending Diversity is a significant contribution to the ongoing discussion on affirmative action in higher education. Perhaps more important, it is a valuable record of the history, events, arguments, and issues surrounding the original lawsuits and the Supreme Court's subsequent ruling, and helps reclaim the debate from those forces opposed to affirmative action. Patricia Gurin is Professor Emerita, Department of Psychology, University of Michigan. Jeffrey S. Lehman, former Dean of the University of Michigan Law School, is President of Cornell University. Earl Lewis is Dean of Rackham Graduate School, University of Michigan.
Although scholarly in nature, the book is readily accessible to professionals and practitioners alike. This book was published as a special issue of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics.
well as teens and young adults, there is the ever-present reality of diverse views evidenced by the ordinary cognitive ... In a sort of self-defense, they must revert to saying, “You don't understand,” which is another way of saying, ...
Freedom & creativity: defending art, defending diversity, special edition
In Praise of Multiculturalism: Defending Diversity
DIVERSITY OF PREFERRED EGO PROCESSES WITHIN FAMILIES Families degrees of tolerance toward their members use of diverse and different ego processes was earlier described as an intrinsic aspect of family life.
But what are the dividing lines between interculturalism and multiculturalism? This volume brings together some of the most prominent scholars in the field to address these two different approaches.
This is the first book to examine whether France’s ongoing defence of the cultural exception as a means to maintain cultural policies and defend cultural diversity is justifiable in the digital age.
Prior to the 1994 elections, protests against top-down programs like diversity management were not greeted politely. ... and diversity programs have fallen, American executives remain quite capable of ferociously defending diversity ...
... “Why history remains a factor in the search for racial equality”, in Gurin P., Lehman J.S. and Lewis E. (eds), Defending diversity: affirmative action at the University of Michigan, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, pp.
The impact of an undergraduate diversity course requirement on students' racial views and attitudes. The Journal of General Education, 51(1), 21–42. ... In: P. Gurin, J. S. Lehman & E. Lewis (Eds.), Defending diversity (pp. 97–188).