Roger Douglas compares responses to terrorism by five liberal democracies—the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand—over the past 15 years. He examines each nation’s development and implementation of counterterrorism law, specifically in the areas of information-gathering, the definition of terrorist offenses, due process for the accused, detention, and torture and other forms of coercive questioning. Douglas finds that terrorist attacks elicit pressures for quick responses, often allowing national governments to accrue additional powers. But emergencies are neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for such laws, which may persist even after fears have eased. He argues that responses are influenced by both institutional interests and prior beliefs, and complicated when the exigencies of office and beliefs point in different directions. He also argues that citizens are wary of government’s impingement on civil liberties and that courts exercise their capacity to restrain the legislative and executive branches. Douglas concludes that the worst antiterror excesses have taken place outside of the law rather than within, and that the legacy of 9/11 includes both laws that expand government powers and judicial decisions that limit those very powers.
The broader central theme that this book explores is the normative vibe under which the present-day counterterrorism discourse is construed and sculpted in the legislative and institutional structures of an authoritarian state where the ...
The broader central theme that this book explores is the normative vibe under which the present-day counterterrorism discourse is construed and sculpted in the legislative and institutional structures of an authoritarian state where the ...
America's Legal Responses to the Emerging Terrorist Threat Raneta Lawson Mack, Michael J. Kelly ... Jose Padilla, an al Qaeda operative instructed to scout out targets for a radiologic "dirty bomb" attack, flew from Pakistan to O'Hare ...
From 2001 to 2009, the United States thus waged war on terrorism in a “no-law zone.” In Laws, Outlaws, and Terrorists, Gabriella Blum and Philip Heymann reject the argument that traditional American values embodied in domestic and ...
17 Roger Douglas, Law, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Terrorism (University of Michigan Press 2014); Oren Gross, Law in Times of Crisis: Emergency Powers in Theory and Practice (Cambridge University Press 2006); Susan N Herman, ...
Handbook on Criminal Justice Responses to Terrorism (Arabic Language)
The Most Dangerous Course of Action will emphasize the need to strengthen the covenant between the American citizen, the state, and the federal government in the face of an asymmetric threat.
broad concept of the 'dangerous offender', see K Harrison, Dangerousness, Risk and the Governance of Serious Sexual and Violent Offenders (New York, Routledge, 2011) 7–8. 12 A von Hirsch, Past or Future Crimes: Deservedness and ...
But—trigger warning!—after reading this book, I predict you’ll find yourself more persuaded than you expected to be of the urgent case for reclaiming our Republican Constitution.”—William Kristol, editor of The Weekly Standard ...
This updated timely book helps students understand the complexities and nuances of a society's pursuit of justice.