This critique of the Australian legal system argues that the present system often obstructs justice, that common law does not seek the truth and that trials are not designed to achieve a just outcome . Discusses topics such as the jury system, civil litigation, the right of silence, the adversary system and the doctrine of precedent. Includes references and an index. The author is a journalist with 'The Australian'. He was five times winner of the Walkley Award for National Journalism and author of 'Can of Worms' 'Amazing Scenes' and 'Trial by Voodoo'.
The Renewable Energy Law Review
... Kwazulu-Natal 1998 (1) SA 765 (CC) 241 South Atlantic Island Development Corporation Ltd v Buchan 1971 (1) SA 234 (C) 164 Swart v Shaw t/a Racing Stables 1996(1) SA 202 (C) 57 Swissborough Diamond Mines (Pty) Ltd v Government of the ...
... de Carvalho Celso de Magalhaes Pinto Edelberto Augusto Gomes Lima Edésio Fernandes Eugenio Pacelli de Oliveira Fernando Gonzaga Jayme Hermes Vilchez Guerrero José Adércio Leite Sampaio José Edgard Penna Amorim Pereira Misabel Abreu ...
Mireille Delmas-Marty et les années UMR
A l'occasion du centenaire du Colloque organisé par la Société de législation comparée en 1900, l'UMR de droit comparé propose de reprendre l'idée lancée alors d'un " droit commun de...
Studi giuridici comparati e internazionalizzazione del diritto: prolusione pronunciata giovedì 20 marzo 2003
Non bis in idem y reincidencia: estudio comparado sobre derechos fundamentales en España y México
See also MB Dorff, “The Group Dynamics Theory of Executive Compensation (2007) 28 Cardozo Law Review 2025, 2035–242 (explaining the failure of boards to rein in executive compensation partly with groupthink). * Sharpe (n 671) 263–4.
Some of the surviving law codes are originals, others near-contemporary copies. Together they preserve a partial but vivid picture of life in the early cites. This occupies more than half the book.
Balancing of interests: liber amicorum Peter Hay zum 70. Gerburtstag