Modern credit, developed during the financial revolution of 1620¬–1720, laid the foundation for England’s political, military, and economic dominance in the eighteenth century. Possessed of a generally circulating credit currency, a modern national debt, and sophisticated financial markets, England developed a fiscal-military state that instilled fear in its foes and facilitated the first industrial revolution. Yet a number of casualties followed in the wake of this new system of credit. Not only was it precarious and prone to accidents, but it depended on trust, public opinion, and ultimately violence. Carl Wennerlind reconstructs the intellectual context within which the financial revolution was conceived. He traces how the discourse on credit evolved and responded to the Glorious Revolution, the Scientific Revolution, the founding of the Bank of England, the Great Recoinage, armed conflicts with Louis XIV, the Whig-Tory party wars, the formation of the public sphere, and England’s expanded role in the slave trade. Debates about credit engaged some of London’s most prominent turn-of-the-century intellectuals, including Daniel Defoe, John Locke, Isaac Newton, Jonathan Swift and Christopher Wren. Wennerlind guides us through these conversations, toward an understanding of how contemporaries viewed the precariousness of credit and the role of violence—war, enslavement, and executions—in the safeguarding of trust.
See A. Marshall (1890) 1920. There are over a dozen references to Hume in Edgeworth's papers on probability and economics, and they reflect a solid command of Hume. See Mirowski 1994, 457. Hume 1906. Spencer (2005,283–99) offers a ...
" Counting Civilian Casualties aims to promote open scientific dialogue by high lighting the strengths and weaknesses of the most commonly used casualty recording and estimation techniques in an understandable format.
... Laws and Usages Respecting Bills of Exchange, and Promissory Notes (Philadelphia: T. Stephens, 1795), 1 (though an early American print, the latter describes its author on the frontispiece as a “notary public of Belfast”).
American Public Opinion and Casualties in Military Conflicts Christopher Gelpi, Peter D. Feaver, Jason Reifler. Noonan, Michael. 1997. “The Illusion of Bloodless Victories.” Orbis 41, no. 2: 308–20. Northcraft, Gregory B., and Margaret ...
This book looks at the history of how humanity has cared for its war casualties and veterans, from ancient times through the aftermath of World War II. This history looks at how humanity has cared for its war casualties and veterans, from ...
This book looks at the history of how humanity has cared for its war casualties and veterans, from ancient times through the aftermath of World War II. This history looks at how humanity has cared for its war casualties and veterans, from ...
Innocent Casualties is a well-documented expose that blows the whistle on the FDA and its 40-year war on alternative healing that may be costing hundreds of thousands of Americans the access to the very medicines that can save their lives.
The London Blitz and the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour are iconic myths for Britain and America.
Medical Management of Biological Casualties Handbook
An "analysis of deeper meaning behind the string of deaths of unarmed citizens like Michael Brown, Eric Garner, and Freddie Gray, providing ... [commentary] on the intersection of race and class in America today"--