A renowned constitutional scholar and a rising star provide a balanced and definitive analysis of the origins and original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. Adopted in 1868, the Fourteenth Amendment profoundly changed the Constitution, giving the federal judiciary and Congress new powers to protect the fundamental rights of individuals from being violated by the states. Yet, according to Randy Barnett and Evan Bernick, the Supreme Court has long misunderstood or ignored the original meaning of the amendment’s key clauses, covering the privileges and immunities of citizenship, due process of law, and the equal protection of the laws. Barnett and Bernick contend that the Fourteenth Amendment was the culmination of decades of debates about the meaning of the antebellum Constitution. Antislavery advocates advanced arguments informed by natural rights, the Declaration of Independence, and the common law. They also utilized what is today called public-meaning originalism. Although their arguments lost in the courts, the Republican Party was formed to advance an antislavery political agenda, eventually bringing about abolition. Then, when abolition alone proved insufficient to thwart Southern repression and provide for civil equality, the Fourteenth Amendment was enacted. It went beyond abolition to enshrine in the Constitution the concept of Republican citizenship and granted Congress power to protect fundamental rights and ensure equality before the law. Finally, Congress used its powers to pass Reconstruction-era civil rights laws that tell us much about the original scope of the amendment. With evenhanded attention to primary sources, The Original Meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment shows how the principles of the Declaration eventually came to modify the Constitution and proposes workable doctrines for implementing the key provisions of Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The book then traces how these concepts solved historical problems confronting framers of the Fourteenth Amendment, including the comity rights of free blacks, private violence and the denial of the protection of the laws, and the notorious ...
... 122, 161–62 Lash, Kurt, 247n68, 248n74 Lecompton Constitution, 59–60, 220– 21n180, 222n201 Lee, Robert E., 81, 90, ... 228n68; Custer's position and, 51; elections of, 61, 70–71, 87–88; on Fugitive Slave Act, 67; on Lee's surrender, ...
88 According to Leonard Levy, Miller's opinion is “one of the most tragically wrong opinions ever given by the Court. ... Reconstructing the Privileges or Immunities Clause, 101 Yale L. J. 1385, 1415 (1992); Michael Kent Curtis, ...
See generally William W. Freehling , Prelude to Civil War : The Nullification Controversy in South Carolina , 1816-1836 ( New York : Harper and Row , 1965 ) . For a discussion of the standoff , see id . at 260-297 .
Volume II of The Rights Retained by the People explores how the Ninth Amendment affects the proper way of interpreting the Constitution as a whole. Contributors: Sotirios A. Barber, Michael...
About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work.
“Gripping and essential.”—Jesse Wegman, New York Times An authoritative history by the preeminent scholar of the Civil War era, The Second Founding traces the arc of the three foundational Reconstruction amendments from their origins ...
Amar shows us how the story of this one relatively compact document reflects the story of America more generally. (For example, much of the Constitution, including the glorious-sounding “We the People,” was lifted from existing American ...
134, 334 F. Supp. 373 (M.D. Ala. 1971, 1972), 203, 219–20 Yates v. United States, 355 U.S. 66 (1957), 240n Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886), 109, 113,
As David Benner reveals in The 14th Amendment and the Incorporation Doctrine, no such function was originally envisioned by the amendment.