Artificial intelligence threatens to disrupt the professions as it has manufacturing. Frank Pasquale argues that law and policy can avert this outcome and promote better ones: instead of replacing humans, technology can make our labor more valuable. Through regulation, we can ensure that AI promotes inclusive prosperity.
Sober yet optimistic, New Laws of Robotics offers inspiring vision of technological progress, in which human capacities and expertise are the irreplaceable center of an inclusive economy.
All in all, it makes a lot of sense that at least certain types of robots should be held responsible for their actions ... Others, such as David McFarland in Guilty Robots, Happy Dogs, claim that we should frame our legal relationships ...
This volume collects the efforts of a diverse group of scholars who each, in their own way, has worked to overcome barriers in order to facilitate necessary and timely discussions of a technology in its infancy.
Argues that treating people and artificial intelligence differently under the law results in unexpected and harmful outcomes for social welfare.
55See daniel Kahneman and Jason Riis, “Living, and Thinking About It: Two Perspectives on Life”, in The Science of Well-Being, Vol. 1 (2005). See also daniel Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow (London: Penguin, 2011).
The development of robot technology to a state of perfection by future civilizations is explored in nine science fiction stories.
This collection brings together a series of contributions by leading scholars in the newly emerging field of artificial intelligence, robotics, and the law.
Explains how artificial intelligence is pushing the limits of the law and how we must respond.
Let the master himself guide you through the key moments in the fictional history of robot-human relations—from the most primitive computers and mobile machines to the first robot to become a man. “It’s good to have Isaac’s classic ...
This book is a response to two questions: first, should we ban or prohibit AI; and, secondly, if not, what should be the salient features of a legal or regulatory framework for AI?