The editor of Vanity Fair magazine offers a hard-hitting assessment of the current Bush administration and its disastrous effects on America at home and abroad. One of North America’s leading magazine editors, Graydon Carter, addresses the fragile state of U.S. democracy with a searing review of the Bush administration. Carter has expressed his deep dissatisfaction with the current state of the nation in his monthly editor’s letters in Vanity Fair — which have aroused widespread comment — and now provides a sweeping, painstakingly detailed account of the ruinous effects of this president’s actions. The invasion of Iraq, which has proven so costly for the U.S. in lives, dollars and international standing, is only the tip of the iceberg. It is the war at home, a quiet, covert, and in many ways more lasting and damaging war, that makes Carter most wary. In almost every aspect of American life, those in the Bush White House have chipped away at decades’ worth of advances in personal rights, women’s rights, the economy and the environment. They have eroded primary civil liberties in the name of the “war on terror” and have amassed record deficits and trade imbalances. They have rolled back policy in every significant area of environmental protection and have squandered the goodwill of the world in the wake of September 11. America is now widely perceived as one of the most dangerous of countries. Carter discusses these topics and many more with great cogency and specificity, detailing what Bush’s radical agenda means for America’s future — and for Canada’s, through its close and complex relationship with the United States. What We’ve Lost is the impassioned argument of a concerned citizen in response to the most precarious political crisis of our time.
The forthright yet unassuming and engagingly honest memoirs of a publisher whose controversial books on domestic and foreign politics made his publishing house a force to be reckoned with.
Hamby , Liberalism and Its Challengers , 279 ; Tyler's quotation is cited in Gillon , Politics and Vision , 193. Also see K. Dolbeare and P. Dolbeare , American Ideologies , chaps . 3 and 4 , and McGann , Taking Reform Seriously ...
In his response to the ideas of Wilmot Horton , David Robinson held up the very existence of a select committee on emigration as evidence that Ricardian economics could not fulfil its promises : ' The Report is a most remarkable ...
The inhabitants of the affluent society owed their “ comfortable servitude ' , according to Marcuse , to the export of ' terror and enslavement ' throughout the world . Encouraged by this thought , the students imported the techniques ...
During the first season of the " Advocates " television program on PBS , 1969-70 , various hapless opponents had been systematically skewered by the show's regular liberal advocate , Howard Miller . Within a year of Agnew's speech ...
See Leo Egan, “Eisenhower Says Officers Should Stay out of Politics,” New York Times, November 24, 1961, 1, 23. CHAPTER 5 1. ... (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1965); Edwards, Goldwater; and Goldberg, Barry Goldwater. 8.
La 4ème de couv. indique : "Le réformisme est une tradition moderne dont l'étude retrace l'origine afin d'y reconnaître une forme de conservatisme qui flirte avec la réaction contre la révolution.
The Challenge of the New Conservatism
Coulson, John. Newman and the Common Tradition: A Study in the Language of Church and Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1 970. Courtney, C. F. "Edmund Burke and the Enlightenment." In England in the Eighteenth Century.
See H. F. Foster , A Genetic History of New England Theology , 1907 ; G. N. Boardman , A History of New England Theology ... Boston : Quadrangle , 1958 ; William G. McLoughlin Jr. , Modern Revivalism : Charles Grandison Finney to Billy ...