How the search for power defines the American presidential office All American presidents, past and present, have cared deeply about power—acquiring, protecting, and expanding it. While individual presidents obviously have other concerns, such as shaping policy or building a legacy, the primacy of power considerations—exacerbated by expectations of the presidency and the inadequacy of explicit powers in the Constitution—sets presidents apart from other political actors. Thinking about the Presidency explores presidents' preoccupation with power. Distinguished presidential scholar William Howell looks at the key aspects of executive power—political and constitutional origins, philosophical underpinnings, manifestations in contemporary political life, implications for political reform, and looming influences over the standards to which we hold those individuals elected to America's highest office. Howell shows that an appetite for power may not inform the original motivations of those who seek to become president. Rather, this need is built into the office of the presidency itself—and quickly takes hold of whoever bears the title of Chief Executive. In order to understand the modern presidency, and the degrees to which a president succeeds or fails, the acquisition, protection, and expansion of power in a president's political life must be recognized—in policy tools and legislative strategies, the posture taken before the American public, and the disregard shown to those who would counsel modesty and deference within the White House. Thinking about the Presidency assesses how the search for and defense of presidential powers informs nearly every decision made by the leader of the nation. In a new preface, Howell reflects on presidential power during the presidency of Barack Obama.
Thinking about the Presidency assesses how the search for and defense of presidential powers informs nearly every decision made by the leader of the nation.
See “100 Days of Trump Claims,” Washington Post, www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims. lied about his executive orders: “I ... 1832, available at https://quod.lib.umich.edu/l/lincoln/lincoln1/1:8?rgn=div1;view=fulltext.
This book traces back to a conversation with Paul Peterson during the spring of 1996. For his introductory American politics textbook, Paul wanted a figure that showed the number of executive agreements issued by presidents over time.
Though some of the books of the Trump era skillfully illuminate the challenges and transformations the nation faces, too many works are more defensive than incisive, more righteous than right.
19 (2018): E4330– E4339; Will Wilkinson, The Density Divide: Urbanization, Polarization, and Populist Backlash (Washington, DC: Niskanen Center, 2019); David Autor, David Dorn, Gordon Hanson, and Kaveh Majlesi, “A Note on the Effect of ...
33 Edwards's formulation of the president as “ facilitator ” of the legislative process has gained wide currency among his peers , including Bond and Fleisher . 34 Whereas Edwards limited his analytical search to the presidency , Jon R.
In Why Presidents Fail and How They Can Succeed Again, Elaine Kamarck surveys these and other recent presidential failures to understand why Americans have lost faith in their leaders—and how they can get it back.
A masterful reassessment of presidential history, this book is essential reading for anyone trying to understand America's fraught political climate.
Deadly distractions -- Totally under control -- Seeking revenge -- The P-word -- Rebelling against the experts -- Refusing to mask up -- Bunkers, blasts, and bibles -- Staring down the dragon -- A sea of empty seats -- The skunks at the ...
Sharpen critical thinking skills with these presidential brain-teasing activities.