In Illiberal Reformers, Thomas Leonard reexamines the economic progressives whose ideas and reform agenda underwrote the Progressive Era dismantling of laissez-faire and the creation of the regulatory welfare state, which, they believed, would humanize and rationalize industrial capitalism. But not for all. Academic social scientists such as Richard T. Ely, John R. Commons, and Edward A. Ross, together with their reform allies in social work, charity, journalism, and law, played a pivotal role in establishing minimum-wage and maximum-hours laws, workmen's compensation, progressive income taxes, antitrust regulation, and other hallmarks of the regulatory welfare state. But even as they offered uplift to some, economic progressives advocated exclusion for others, and did both in the name of progress. Leonard meticulously reconstructs the influence of Darwinism, racial science, and eugenics on scholars and activists of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, revealing a reform community deeply ambivalent about America's poor. Economic progressives championed labor legislation because it would lift up the deserving poor while excluding immigrants, African Americans, women, and 'mental defectives, ' whom they vilified as low-wage threats to the American workingman and to Anglo-Saxon race integrity. Economic progressives rejected property and contract rights as illegitimate barriers to needed reforms. But their disregard for civil liberties extended much further. Illiberal Reformers shows that the intellectual champions of the regulatory welfare state proposed using it not to help those they portrayed as hereditary inferiors, but to exclude them. -- Provided by publisher.
The first edited collection to explore one of the most rapidly growing area of philosophy: political epistemology.
Jim Crow was the law of the land, and what Kirk Fuoss describes chillingly as the “peak years of lynching” stretched from 1880 to 1935.35 The repetitiveness that Hull and Tate note should be viewed, therefore, not as an aesthetic or ...
In Meyer v. Nebraska; Laurence Tribe, "Lawrence v. Texas. The Fundamental Right'That Dare Not Speak Its Name," Harvard Law Review 117 (2004): 1934. In both cases: Ibid. The Meyer court: Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390,399 (1923).
This volume assesses the history of eugenics in the United States and its status in the age of the Human Genome Project. The essays explore the early support of compulsory sterilization by doctors and legislators.
American Eugenics demonstrates how biological theories of race, gender, and sexuality are crucially linked through a concern with regulating the "unfit.
An examination of property rights reforms in Russia before the revolution reveals the advantages and pitfalls of liberal democracy in action—from a government that could be described as neither liberal nor democratic.
Philippa Levine is the Mary Helen Thompson Centennial Professor in the Humanities at the University of Texas at Austin.
The conviction that martyrs, though dead, can still speak to the church, led Ryle to pen these pungent biographies of five English Reformers.
... 1890–1920 ( Columbus , OH , 1977 ) . 13. Charles McCurdy , “ The Knight Sugar Decision of 1895 and the Modernization of American Corporation Law , 1869–1903 , " Business History 354 Notes.
Martha Nussbaum asks: How can we sustain a decent society that aspires to justice and inspires sacrifice for the common good?