Why the social character of scientific knowledge makes it trustworthy Are doctors right when they tell us vaccines are safe? Should we take climate experts at their word when they warn us about the perils of global warming? Why should we trust science when so many of our political leaders don't? Naomi Oreskes offers a bold and compelling defense of science, revealing why the social character of scientific knowledge is its greatest strength—and the greatest reason we can trust it. Tracing the history and philosophy of science from the late nineteenth century to today, this timely and provocative book features a new preface by Oreskes and critical responses by climate experts Ottmar Edenhofer and Martin Kowarsch, political scientist Jon Krosnick, philosopher of science Marc Lange, and science historian Susan Lindee, as well as a foreword by political theorist Stephen Macedo.
" RANDI WEINGARTEN, president, American Federation of Teachers "If Dan Willingham had written this book fifty years ago, American education would have been spared innumerable snake-oil peddlers, unkeepable promises, deceptive claims, and ...
Trust and Confidence at the Interfaces of the Life Sciences and Society highlights research on the elements of trust and how to build, mend, or maintain trust; and examine best practices in the context of scientist engagement with lay ...
“We have been working with Dr. Fred Singer and Dr. Dwight Lee [an economist, holding the Ramsey Chair of Private Enterprise at the University of Georgia], who have authored articles on junk science and indoor air quality,” Hockaday ...
This book is part of the vanguard of efforts to establish new norms of social science research.
This book, an essential follow-up to his 1999 The Marriage Clinic, offers therapists, students, and researchers detailed intervention for working with couples, and offers couples a roadmap to a stronger future together.
Harley-Davidson reinvigorated its Purpose narrative for its 100-year anniversary in 2003 by crafting a memoir of HarleyDavidson designer William Godfrey “Willie G.” Davidson, grandson of the founder. It commissioned a book in his voice ...
This collection of essays is based on the high profile workshop 'Why Trust a Theory?' and provides interdisciplinary perspectives on empirical testing in fundamental physics from leading physicists, philosophers and historians of science.
Trust in Numbers questions whether such success in the study of stars, molecules, or cells should be an attractive model for research on human societies, and examines why the natural sciences are highly quantitative in the first place.
Onemight easily agree with Bradley E.Schaefer, who concluded there was simply “no consensus outthere” (asquoted in Powell, 1995, p.19). In short,theambiguous statusofthe big bang theoryisanother factor makingit difficult toestablish ...
At a public forum in New York City in 1994, journalist David Halberstam questioned Paul Tagliabue, then the NFL's commissioner, about the mounting toll of concussions among the league's players. Halberstam was not just any journalist: ...