Much of the world today views America as an imperialist nation bent on global military, economic, and cultural domination. At home few share this negative view, largely because of a widespread belief in the irreproachable purity of our goals. Bob Pepperman Taylor, however, argues that our moral self-righteousness may potentially imperil our democratic ideals and threaten democracy itself by plunging us into illiberalism.
Taylor looks closely at six key thinkers in the Progressive tradition whose work helps illuminate the essential flaws in our current thinking about democracy. Their writings, he contends, offer insights that can reinforce and strengthen a vigorous democratic faith, warn us of the dangers inherent in various forms of democratic arrogance, and counsel a kind of doubt or humility that would make us much better democratic citizens.
All six thinkers—Herbert Croly, Walter Lippmann, John Dewey, Jane Addams, Carl Becker, and Aldo Leopold—were active in the first half of the twentieth century and grew out of and reflect the temper of American Progressivism, which spawned the most creative, optimistic, and committed generation of democratic theorists and activists in American history. Their writings, in Taylor's view, illuminate harmful beliefs that constrain and even delude the popular democratic imagination in America.
Taylor argues that Croly, Lippmann, and Dewey overestimate the normative value of science and underestimate the utopianism of their democratic visions. On the other hand, Addams, Becker, and Leopold resisted these scientific and utopian temptations. By advocating a kind of humility, they offered reform-minded Americans a stronger understanding of what it meant to practice democratic citizenship, however imperfectly. Addams counsels us to "walk humbly before God"; Becker embraces the Progressive faith in equality and justice but discards its dogma of certain progress; and Leopold employs moral authority rather than his scientific training to defend our natural inheritance in what he recognizes is an ambiguous political debate.
These three, Taylor argues, by aiming less at the grand transformation of the human condition than at practical solutions, show greater respect for democratic possibilities than did their more messianic counterparts. They promote a much more modest understanding of the possibilities both for democracy and the role of science in informing democratic practice. They also point to a clearer understanding of the virtues that citizens should cultivate if democracy is to prosper.
23 John S. Dryzek,Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 9. 24 Alan Wolfe, The Limits of Legitimacy: Political Contradictions in Introduction 9.
In this book, Paul Sniderman demonstrates that a concentration on the pathologies of citizens' political thinking has obscured the intense clash of opposing belief systems in the electorate.
POLITICAL ORIGINS Argyle, N.J. 2002. “Developing a Foundation: Administration in the Polis.” Public Administration Quarterly 26: 346–372. The author argues that the foundation of Western administrative structures exists in the Greek ...
Can citizens - and democracy - exist independently of the state? This text provides an accessible guide to the theories and debates that surround the key political concepts of state, citizenship, and democracy today.
... from identity and participation to integration or radicalization: a critical appraisal', in Assaad E. Azzi, Xenia Chryssochoou, Bert Klandermans and Bernd Simon (eds), Identity and Participation in Culturally Diverse Societies: A ...
Filer , John E. , Lawrence W. Kenny , and Rebecca B. Morton . 1993. Redistribution , Income , and Voting . American Journal of Political Science 37 : 63–87 . ... Gibson , James L. , and Richard D. Bingham . 252 / Bibliography.
This volume Struggle, Resistance and Violence examines the fact that all over the world the rights of citizens have come under enormous pressure and addresses the many ways in which people are ‘making claims’ against both autocratic and ...
This leads to an intrusion of politics—whether democratic or not—into areas with which it is not well equipped to deal.30 In this way, hyper-democracy can be read as a symptom of postdemocracy, a response to the absence of meaningful ...
Douglas Klusmeyer clarifies the sources of Western concepts of citizenship, from the ancient Greeks to modern social democrats: where they came from, how they evolved, and where they tend to...
... 1986 Gideonse, Hendrik D. (1990); “Organizing Schools to Encourage Teacher Inquiry”, in Elmore, Richard F. (ed.); ... 1990 Gilder, George (1994); “The Collapse of the American Family”, in Turner, Bryan and Hamilton, Peter (eds.); ...